Campaigning for next year’s presidential election has not officially started, and Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) has not yet been confirmed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) national congress — which is scheduled to make its decision on July 19 — as its official candidate.
However, attacks against Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) have already escalated, including rumors that the Tsai family owns the Hai Pa Wang seafood restaurant chain, which has investments in China.
Tsai is now being described as a member of the elite — someone who wears expensive, brand-name shoes. Such aspersions are intended to mark Tsai as a member of a privileged moneyed elite while Hung is portrayed as an ordinary member of the public. Tsai’s father has even been accused of being a “traitor” for helping the Japanese colonial government repair airplanes.
This is a classic example of negative campaigning and it is especially ironic given Hung’s earlier statements that she and Tsai would compete woman to woman in a high-profile election.
The KMT obviously has not learned its lesson from the public backlash against comments made by former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) last year, when he called then-Taipei mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) a descendant of “imperial Japanese subjects.”
The party still thinks it can rely on nationalistic rhetoric to demonize its opponents and gain votes. However, the reality is that this type of mudslinging not only harms its own image, but also insults the intelligence of voters.
A relative who is a pan-blue supporter said that the whole of his close family were disgusted by Hau’s “imperial subjects” comment. Although the family did not support Ko in the mayoral election, they were also unwilling to vote for KMT mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文).
With the KMT’s failure in the special municipality mayoral elections last year fresh in mind, could it be that it still has not learned its lesson and is likely to make the same mistake all over again?
Labeling Hung an ordinary citizen and Tsai a person of power and privilege mirrors the framing of the competition between Ko and Lien in the campaign for Taipei mayor. However, any comparison between Tsai and Lien is spurious.
Tsai comes from a wealthy background, but her father worked hard to acquire the family’s wealth. Lien’s situation was very different, as he was the scion of a political dynasty which spanned three generations — and which by its dominant position had amassed a fortune worth tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars.
Tsai’s father and brothers are not members of the political elite, so where does the label “powerful and privileged” come from?
Hung, who has been involved in politics for more than 20 years and is backed by the KMT’s vast political and business machine, must be considered the candidate who represents power and privilege — and her political power and financial support cannot be underestimated. Although Hung is only moderately well-off, there is no doubt that she represents the interests of the elite.
After more than seven years of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) incompetence, the public’s biggest desire is to have a capable person pull the nation out of its slide and root out corruption.
Demonizing opponents does not highlight one’s own capabilities; a much better way is to win over voters by clearly expounding one’s political philosophy.
Hsu Yu-fang is a professor at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs