Wild gyrations in Hong Kong share prices are raising concerns that a new trading link with mainland China is a conduit for questionable trading practices that could undermine the territory’s reputation as a center of global finance.
At least four companies that climbed to dizzying values in only a few months have come abruptly crashing down in the past several weeks for reasons that remain unclear.
The strange trading patterns have gripped Hong Kong’s financial community with a narrative of paper fortunes built quickly and then wiped out in an even shorter time.
Illustration: Tania Chou
The most high-profile case is Chinese solar panel maker Hanergy Thin Film Power Group, now under investigation by the market watchdog. Also affected are two Hong Kong-listed units of Chinese billionaire Pan Sutong’s (潘蘇通) Goldin conglomerate involved in horse breeding and wine trading. The most recent is Digital Domain Holdings, whose main business is a California special effects firm founded two decades ago by Titanic and Avatar director James Cameron, who no longer has a stake after it went bankrupt in 2012. It is perhaps best known more recently for creating a hologram of deceased rapper Tupac Shakur to perform alongside Snoop Dogg at a California music festival. In a little over two months, the shares soared ninefold and then abruptly plunged last week to one-third of their peak.
Market watchers say a tide of money sweeping in from mainland China following the launch of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect trading link last year has amplified speculation and increased risks for investors. The link allows investors in each city to trade on the other city’s exchange. Hanergy and the two Goldin companies are among 286 stocks Chinese investors can buy via the link.
“The recent developments have sparked concerns about new dynamics that our regulators need to deal with,” Asian Corporate Governance Association Hong Kong research director Michael Cheng (鄭孟揚) said. “We hope that it will be the two markets upping the game for each other, but with the recent developments, we have a genuine concern that there’s a real risk of a race to the bottom.”
Recent price swings are “unprecedented” in Hong Kong, he said.
The territory, along with London, New York and Tokyo, is a key global financial center, a status underpinned by the reputation of its legal and financial systems which are based on the laws of its former colonial ruler, Britain.
Local traders say the market turbulence is a sign of the larger stock trading frenzy spilling over from China, where the Shanghai benchmark has more than doubled in the past year in a boom powered by borrowed money and a stampede of rookie traders.
Nine of the Hong Kong exchange’s 10 busiest days on record were in April or May as trading on the link surged to a high. After a quiet start, the value of Chinese trades in Hong Kong via the link jumped to US$30 billion in April, out of US$490 billion in total stock market turnover. In May it eased to US$13.2 billion out of US$374 billion.
Experts believe the companies most susceptible to manipulation are those with a relatively small amount of freely traded stock, known as the free float, making them more volatile.
Hong Kong’s market regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission, last week warned that Goldin Properties Holdings stock could “fluctuate substantially” and investors “should exercise extreme caution” because its Chinese billionaire owner and 13 other shareholders own more than 95 percent of outstanding shares.
Even companies not on the official list of stocks eligible for trading on the link, such as Digital Domain, are affected, said David Webb, a former investment banker turned shareholder and corporate governance advocate who believes many Chinese are coming to Hong Kong to open stock trading accounts.
“There are dozens of stocks that are trading far away from fair value,” he said. “It’s a fairly widespread phenomenon at the moment.”
In Hanergy’s case, shares of the solar panel maker backed by Chinese billionaire Li Hejun (李河君) rose more than sixfold since last summer until May 20, when they suddenly halved in the first hour of trading for no apparent reason, wiping out about half his fortune. The shares are now suspended.
In an interview with Chinese state media released a week later, Li dismissed reports that the company was under scrutiny.
The next day, the Securities and Futures Commission took the unusual step of confirming it had launched a formal investigation “into the affairs” of the company.
Separately, Goldin Financial Holdings and Goldin Properties Holdings tumbled more than 40 percent, wiping out a combined US$15 billion of market value. Before the crash, the shares had quadrupled, inflating Pan’s personal fortune. Forbes now estimates it at US$11.2 billion.
It is unclear why Hanergy or the Goldin companies plummeted.
Digital Domain’s sell-off appears to have been sparked by rumors that a Chinese businessman linked to the company was arrested. The businessman, Che Fung, and a partner were the previous owners of the special effects firm, but in an intricate deal, sold their stake two years ago to Digital Domain in exchange for convertible bonds. Under certain conditions, the bonds can be exchanged for stock worth nearly half of the company’s enlarged share capital, giving him the potential to become one of the company’s biggest shareholders.
Digital Domain denied “suggestions in certain media reports” that any executive directors or senior management had been arrested recently. It confirmed Che was a bondholder, but declined to comment on his status.
“For Digital Domain, this is just a very short term bubble” that popped after the arrest rumors triggered the liquidations by speculators, Ample Capital director of asset management Alex Wong (黃國英) said.
“The company is selling a concept in virtual reality, so that is a very long-term story” not matching the company’s brief spike in valuation, he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under