China’s plan to add a thinner-than-paper “democratic” veneer to the way it runs Hong Kong failed as expected on Thursday, but Beijing suffered an own-goal, which meant it could not blame pro-democracy lawmakers for its defeat.
The walkout by loyalist lawmakers just minutes before the ballot meant that 28 lawmakers voted against the proposal, eight were in favor and 34 did not cast votes.
The bill needed the support of 47 of the council’s 70 members to pass and that was never going to happen, not a little detail that mattered to China’s state-run media, with the People’s Daily saying the opposition had shown that “they are disturbers and destroyers in the process of the democratization of Hong Kong.”
Even some Western pundits said that the pro-democracy faction might have let down Hong Kong’s 5 million residents, because the bill, which would have allowed them to vote for their chief executive for the first time in 2017 — albeit from a slate of candidates pre-approved by Beijing — was the best chance the territory was going to get from China’s rulers.
However, pro-democracy Hong Kong Legislator Claudia Mo (毛孟靜), who called the government’s proposal “a maggot-ridden apple,” summed up the dilemma facing her and her colleagues, saying: “This resolution is a fraud. This bill makes nonsense of the word democracy. It is a very bogus version of universal suffrage.”
Under the plan, a 1,200-member nominating committee would choose two to three candidates for chief executive from a list of a minimum of five and a maximum of 10 nominees, which the government said would ensure balanced participation and competition by increasing the number of candidates and providing cross-sector support.
Yet, for many Hong Kongers, the nominating committee, which was to be made up of representatives from four major sectors, did not sound much different from the 1,200-member Election Committee that selected the chief executive in the 2012 election, with 300 members each from four sectors: industry, commerce and finance; the professions; labor, religious and social service groups; and members of the Legislative Council, district councils, Chinese National People’s Congress and other politicians.
The 2012 election, like all elections since Hong Kong’s handover in 1997, gave the territory a chief executive who was more concerned with carrying out Beijing’s instructions than listening to the desires and aspirations of the people he is supposed to represent.
Can an election really be called democratic when voters do not have the opportunity to vote for someone of their own choosing?
Taiwanese who lived through the Martial Law era know the answer to that question all too well, as did the voters of the former Soviet Union and its satellite states, and the more than 11.4 million Iraqi voters who in 2002 unanimously voted to give then-president Saddam Hussein another seven-year term. Perhaps 100 percent of North Korean voters really did turn out in March last year to unanimously elect Kim Jong-un to the Supreme People’s Assembly, although the outside world would never hear differently and did little more than snort at the news reports out of Pyongyang.
Despite the Chinese media’s propaganda, Hong Kong’s pro-democracy legislators, activists and supporters are not seeking independence from Beijing; they just want to be able to elect someone who is willing to stand up for their needs and defend the territory’s special status, not just suck up to Zhongnanhai and the big business powers that control the territory.
By voting down the “reform” proposal, the opposition said it was not willing to turn Hong Kong into a Potemkin village that Beijing could use to pretend that it was willing to experiment with democracy.
Hong Kong now faces an uncertain future, with the likelihood of more protests and turmoil, but the fault lies with Beijing, not the territory’s democratic proponents.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.