All 28 member states of the Council of the EU have agreed to new European data protection laws that could see tough new regulations unified across the whole of the EU.
The changes would allow for a pan-European framework for privacy and the handling of European citizens’ data, instead of the current scenario where data privacy is regulated by watchdogs in the country of operation within Europe, such as Ireland.
The changes were put forward by the European Commission three years ago and form a crucial step toward a single digital union. The European Parliament filed its agreement in principle more than a year ago, but the council, where each country’s government has representation, has struggled to come to an agreement.
“Today, we have moved a great step closer to modernized and harmonized data protection framework for the European Union,” Latvian Minister for Justice Dzintars Rasnas said.
The agreement came in the final week of Latvia’s council presidency. The negotiations going forward become the responsibility of Luxembourg as it takes over the presidency.
“EU laws are now lagging behind the pace of technologies and business practices. Our personal data is collected, then used and transferred in ways which most consumers are oblivious to. An appropriate update must put control of personal data back in the hands of European consumers,” European Consumer Organization director general Monique Goyens said.
This new regulation is the opportunity to close gaps, ensure robust standards and stipulate that EU laws apply to all businesses operating in the EU.
DATA PRIVACY
While some welcome clearer and more unified rules and regulations, lobbying, which has delayed proceedings, has shown that some aspects of the proposal have companies worried.
Of particular contention is a clause that would allow users to sue companies who process data, such as cloud storage providers, as well as those that purchase it or collect it. Companies including Amazon and IBM have said that it could kill off Europe’s cloud computing industry .
Many US technology companies have based their European operations in Ireland, including Facebook and Google. Current laws mean that if one data protection authority clears a company’s actions and regulates compliance with local laws, informed by European law, that company can then operate in any European member state without the need to clear its actions in each country.
The European Commission put forward new regulation that would toughen European law, which would in turn toughen data privacy laws in European nation states. However, the proposal could also see the formation of a single nominated authority that could rule on large or politically contentious data protection issues.
Facebook and Google are subject to both legal and regulatory challenges over data privacy. The latest action is a lawsuit from the Belgian privacy commission which deemed that Facebook operating an office within its country meant it should answer to its regulation, rather than just to the data protection authority of Ireland, where it is headquartered.
“I am very content that after more than three years of negotiations, we have finally found a compromise on the text. The new data protection regulation, adapted to the needs of the digital age, will strengthen individual rights of our citizens and ensure a high standard of protection,” Rasnas said.
The agreement will lead to a “trilogue” beginning next week between the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU on each of their amendments to the commission’s proposal.
“It is encouraging that these discussions are scheduled to start next week, though it is likely to be well into next year before they are completed. We can then expect a further two years before any law is implemented, to give people time to prepare for the changes,” said David Smith, the deputy commissioner from the information commissioner’s office.
SINGLE REGULATOR
How tough the new laws and regulation becomes will be up for debate. The idea of a single data regulator — a one-stop-shop — for large issues has been popular in theory. What form that would take is likely to be crucial for companies such as Facebook and Google operating in Europe.
Under scrutiny are proposals regarding: unambiguous consent for any data collection, such as tracking for adverts; limits to the ability to use data for purposes other than those for which it was collected, such as profiling; and a strengthened “right to be forgotten.”
The Council of the EU has agreed upon new fines for breaches of EU privacy and data protection law which are up to 2 percent of a company’s global annual turnover. The European Parliament would have them as high as 5 percent of turnover.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry