China is carrying out large-scale land reclamation in the South China Sea and is suspected of accelerating its construction of military bases in the region. It also released a defense white paper, China’s Military Strategy (中國的軍事戰略), late last month, which states that China is readying itself for a new era of “maritime military struggle.”
The US could no longer contain itself and finally sent warships and planes to conduct surveillance in a high-profile intervention in the South China Sea dispute.
Meanwhile, Japan, which recently renewed the Guidelines for Defense Cooperation under the US-Japan Security Treaty with the US, has made active deployments in an attempt secure a share in the waters.
The world’s three largest economies all have their own reasons for switching their focus to the area and a competition unprecedented in the 70 years since the end of World War II is quickly taking shape in the region.
The situation in the South China Sea is increasingly complex. Taiwan has had troops stationed on Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), the largest of the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), since the end of World War II. On May 26, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) proposed the South China Sea peace initiative, which he had been working on for quite some time, so as to solidify Taiwan’s role as the “critical weakness” (關鍵弱勢) in the competition between the three powers in the area.
Disputes in the South China Sea have been going on for a long time, although the situation was calm prior to the 1970s.
In 1935, the Republic of China (ROC) government published its Map of South China Sea Islands (中國南海各島嶼圖) to assert its claim to the four island groups in the region: the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島), the Spratly Islands, the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Macclesfield Bank (Zhongsha Islands, 中沙群島). After the war against Japan ended, the ROC recovered all the islands in the region previously occupied by Japan.
After the civil war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Chinese Communist Party broke out in China, the ROC continued operating, and the Ministry of the Interior published the influential Location Map of the South China Sea Islands (南海諸島位置圖) in 1947, featuring the “U-shaped line” — also known as the “11-dash line” — that is so hotly debated today.
After the KMT relocated to Taiwan in 1949, the CCP modified it to a “nine-dash line.” Based on this, Chinese textbooks list the James Shoal (Zengmu Shoal, 曾母暗沙) as the southernmost territory of China.
After the withdrawal from the Chinese mainland, then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was forced to give up Xisha’s Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島), which was closer to China’s Hainan Province. However, although Taiwan was under tremendous pressure to be “liberated” by China, Taipei has insisted on maintaining troops on the Dongsha Islands as well as on the distant Taiping Island in the Nansha Islands to this day.
As a result, Beijing has tacitly acknowledged Taipei’s long-term effective jurisdiction over certain islands in the South China Sea, a favorable result for Taiwan. Although Chiang had a strong interest in safeguarding the islands after losing China in 1949, he was incapable of putting troops on the other major islands in the region.
After Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh died in 1969, tensions between the Chinese and Vietnamese communists deepened.
In 1974, the year before the establishment of North Vietnam, Beijing successfully gained control of the entire Xisha Islands after a sea battle with South Vietnam. The competition between countries striving to occupy the islands in the South China Sea was closely related to the promulgation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982.
The convention, which came into effect in 1994, sets a 200 nautical mile (370km) limit as the “exclusive economic zone,” and this has hastened occupation of islands by claimants such as Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam in the South China Sea based on their maritime interests and they have carried out a number of construction projects there.
Taiwan did not take part in the rush for islands in this highly competitive process and in the face of Beijing’s oppression, the nation has gradually been reduced to a supporting role in the game.
When China signed the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with 10 ASEAN countries in 2002, it excluded Taiwan, an embarrassment to the nation that has held effective jurisdiction over Taiping Island for decades.
Coming under pressure from China on the South China Sea issue, Taiwan has tried to figure out how to break away from its disadvantaged position. At a time when China, the US and Japan are readying themselves for the game as tensions rise in the region, this was the right time for Ma to propose his South China Sea peace initiative in order to promote peace. By doing so, he has greatly increased Taiwan’s visibility on the issue, while at the same time highlighting its vantage point as a peacemaker.
His proposal obtained the desired result, as it was supported by Washington, while Beijing is not opposed to it. Taiwan has successfully filled the role of “critical weakness” in this difficult situation.
During her ongoing visit to the US, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has pledged not to abandon sovereignty over the South China Sea if elected president next year.
This shows that Taiwan’s two major parties have reached a consensus on maintaining Taiwanese sovereignty in the region.
However, faced with today’s chaotic situation in the region, the question is: Who is better placed to lead Taiwan as it plays the role of “critical weakness?”
We will have the answer by this time next year.
John Lim is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations