Ireland held a referendum on the legalization of same-sex marriage on May 22, and 62.1 percent of Irish voters supported the proposal. The Catholic Church representatives opposed to the proposal behaved in a democratic spirit and offered their blessings. Outside Dublin Castle, an Irish government complex, many supporters waved rainbow flags to celebrate this significant day.
Ireland has always been a conservative Catholic state compared with other countries in western Europe; it was only in 1993 that gay sex was decriminalized. As social attitudes and thinking has changed, Ireland, where 92 percent of the total population are Catholic, has become the world’s first country to legalize same-sex marriage. So why does it feel as if Taiwan, which has never criminalized gay sex, is so far behind?
In a public hearing organized by the legislature a few months ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) described same-sex marriage as encouraging “bestiality,” and opponents to marriage equality resort to accusations lacking grounds in medical knowledge and common sense and label homosexuality unnatural and perverse and as facilitating the spread of HIV/AIDS and venereal diseases.
We should respect every individual’s right to freedom of speech and we should respect a person’s sexual orientation. Gay rights are not a favor bestowed on gays by straight society and the argument that Taiwanese society is already friendly to homosexuals, so gays should know when enough is enough, is wrong-headed. Homosexuals and heterosexuals are equals and must be treated as such, because if they are not, homosexuals are likely to become second-class citizens.
All citizens are obliged to pay tax, perform military service and receive an education, but homosexuals are deprived of the freedom to marry. Such discriminatory treatment highlights the state’s bias and fear of homosexuality. Some people advocate banning same-sex marriage based on excuses such as the need to maintain the tradition or definition of marriage.
Such calls for differentiated treatment represent systemic homophobia. They must not be legitimized because the effect is such that differentiated treatment is seen and understood as government support for segregation.
Other people base their restrictions on the rights of others on the need to maintain social order, but a simulated constitutional court organized by a former grand justice last year declared that the ban on same-sex marriage violates the Constitution. Moreover, according to the most recent opinion polls presented in the media, more than half of all Taiwanese now support the legalization of same-sex marriage. If Taiwan could learn from Ireland and hold a referendum on the issue, perhaps the rainbow flag could fly forever over democratic development.
The Ministry of Justice has repeatedly argued that the marriage system is protected by the Constitution, and that amendments to the law should take social development and public sentiment into consideration. Nevertheless, the legalization of diverse family formations across the world has proven that “marriage” and “family” are concepts that evolve, and that there is no such thing as so-called “heterosexual nature.” Therefore, I will have to keep fighting together with those who support marriage equality.
Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon said in an interview with the San Francisco Examiner last year that he hopes South Korea can be the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage. Inspired by Ireland’s passing of the proposal, one can only hope that Taiwan we will see the same positive results.
David Weng is a probation assistant at the Tainan District Prosecutors’ Office.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations