The US auto safety watchdog, long criticized as toothless and slow, is showing both bark and bite under its new boss — a testimony to his credentials as a safety expert and a hardening of the administration’s policy after a wave of deadly defects.
Having taken the helm of the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in January, Mark Rosekind has wasted no time in forcing reluctant companies into recalling millions of defective vehicles. In doing so, he has shown greater willingness than some of his predecessors to use the government’s full legal powers over the industry, some for the first time.
In the fortnight week alone, the agency announced the biggest recall in US history, involving nearly 34 million vehicles with potentially deadly Takata Corp air bags. It also scheduled a rare public hearing to review Fiat Chrysler recalls involving 10 million vehicles and warned of potential multiple penalties that could total US$700 million.
Illustration: Yusha
Rosekind, 60, took over the regulator after a bruising year of criticism from the public and US Congress over failures to respond quickly to major safety crises, and he came with clear marching orders from Washington: Take dangerous vehicles off US roads.
“We brought him in to bring it,” US Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx said. “Having someone who personifies the kind of aggressiveness with which we expect the agency to operate is healthy for external stakeholders as well as our own folks at DOT [the US Department of Transportation] and NHTSA.”
Current and former officials say recalls did not always serve as a top priority for earlier administrators.
For instance, David Kelly, who filled the job on an acting basis at the end of the former US president George W. Bush’s administration, focused on fuel economy.
During that administration, the agency’s preferred approach was to address safety issues through voluntary service campaigns, though they were still outnumbered by recalls. Critics say a similar approach continued into US President Barack Obama’s administration.
“We finally have an NHTSA administrator who wants to be the cop on the beat,” said Joan Claybrook, who led the agency in the 1970s.
Rosekind declined to be interviewed for the story.
David Strickland, the last permanent NHTSA administrator who served between 2010 and 2013, said that Rosekind was looking for new levers to bring change, just as past agency chiefs did.
“I used tools that were uncommon when I was administrator,” said Strickland, who cited US$49 million in civil penalties he levied against Toyota Motor Corp. Up to then, the regulator’s biggest ever fine had totaled only US$1 million, he said.
During his tenure, the agency drew fire for being slow to act on unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles, and over an agreement with Fiat Chrysler to limit the recall of Jeep vehicles equipped with fuel tanks that could rupture and catch fire in crashes.
Now an attorney who represents an automaker group that includes Toyota, Strickland said the compromise reached on Jeep vehicles in 2013 prevented a drawn-out legal battle that would have kept unsafe cars on the roads for years.
The same recalls are now to be scrutinized at Rosekind’s hearing next month.
Several other former NHTSA chiefs were unavailable for comment.
The appointment of Rosekind, a former member of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), raised eyebrows because of his lack of auto industry background, but was welcomed by safety advocates, who viewed his public safety expertise credentials as eclipsing those of many of his predecessors.
Distinguished by a towering frame and gray mane, Rosekind is a Stanford and Yale-educated expert, who worked as a scientific consultant before spending four years at the NTSB, where he took part in seven major accident investigations.
“He thrived under pressure and was a commanding, decisive presence at accident scenes,” said Debbie Hersman, who chaired the NTSB at the time.
Former NHTSA officials say a lack of safety expertise has made it hard for some administrators to press for recalls internally.
A congressional report released last year said the agency for years either overlooked or failed to grasp evidence identifying a deadly ignition-switch defect in General Motors Co (GM) vehicles, which has led to 104 deaths and 2.6 million recalls.
In its defense, the agency has pointed to its limited resources and enforcement powers. Its Office of Defects Investigation, responsible for monitoring 250 million vehicles on US roads, has a staff of 51 and an annual budget of US$10 million — about US$0.04 per vehicle. By contrast, GM alone generated net income of US$2.8 billion last year.
Yet acting within the same constraints, Rosekind has utilized some legal tools that have been available, but rarely used before.
In the Takata recall, the regulator for the first time is exercising its authority to expedite recalls under the 2000 Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act. The Fiat Chrysler hearing is to be the first of its kind for the watchdog since 2012 and the biggest ever.
“He’s using the resources he has and working to change the culture at the agency from one that gets along with the auto industry to one that regulates the auto industry,” said Clarence Ditlow, a leading auto safety advocate, who heads Washington-based Center for Auto Safety.
The agency now has a boss who is not tied to the auto industry, but knows Washington and regulation, Ditlow said.
Automakers and Wall Street investors expect the new tough regulator to drive up industry costs by forcing companies to boost reserves for future recalls after a record 64 million vehicles were recalled last year.
Yet bringing lasting change remains a daunting challenge for Rosekind, whose term is to end along with Obama’s in early 2017.
Takata’s airbag recall alone could take years to complete as automakers scramble to line up replacement parts.
“The next two years is going to be a sprint. We have no time to waste” Rosekind said in March.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry