Education and politics should be kept separate. This is a basic principle of democracy. However, Wu Kun-tsai (吳昆財), a history professor at National Chiayi University and a member of the history curriculum committee for the 12-year national education system, claims that textbooks all over the world serve a political agenda and have nothing to do with academic objectivity.
The implication behind this statement is clear enough even if he did not come right out and say that education is not about enlightened speculation, but about indoctrination and brainwashing, and that the textbooks for the 12-year national education system would be written the way people want to write them.
If textbooks are intended to serve politics, does that not mean that the authors are nothing other than political hatchet men? To see someone who studies and teaches history openly and almost triumphantly claim that there is no academic objectivity without the slightest bit of remorse makes one wonder what happened to academic conscience.
Under autocracies, dictatorships and communist regimes, it would be closer to the truth to say that the teaching of history is merely a tool for obscuring the truth and brainwashing the masses. Under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Taiwan’s history textbooks have indeed been leaning toward outright myth, lies and distortions of fact, but to say that textbooks anywhere in the world are meant to serve politics and ignore academic objectivity is too bold and irresponsible.
When it comes to attributing responsibility, there is one criterion: The further a society gets from the actual event, the heavier the responsibility to depict it accurately.
Taiwan’s textbooks do not clearly explain who bears most responsibility for the 228 Incident. Investigation revealed that the order given to troops to open fire was passed on by then-Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀), but nothing is said about who issued the order. Can a history book like this, where there are only victims, but no aggressors, heal the wounds caused by the 228 Incident?
In addition, does leaving Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) — who self-immolated to defend the freedom of expression — out of history textbooks imply that freedom of speech was a right bestowed upon the public from above, not something that was fought for?
Politicizing education results in indoctrination, and gives rise to a populace who can process information but lack critical thinking or insight. The brightest members of this demographic become the sycophants and pseudo-intellectuals who prop up autocratic regimes.
Ma, who graduated from Harvard Law School, is a perfect example of these dull-witted stalwarts of the “status quo”: The mention of lifting Martial Law in Taiwan gave him the heebie jeebies; he opposed introducing legislative elections; he opposed direct presidential elections; he opposed the introduction of referendums and he supports the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and the cross-strait trade in services and in goods agreements.
How does his record reflect an academic understanding of the norms of democracy? Anyone in the street knows what lurong (鹿茸) means — the Chinese word for budding deer antlers — but because it was not mentioned in the textbooks he had read, Ma thought the term referred to the fur in deer’s ears. What use is knowledge without common sense?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry