Education and politics should be kept separate. This is a basic principle of democracy. However, Wu Kun-tsai (吳昆財), a history professor at National Chiayi University and a member of the history curriculum committee for the 12-year national education system, claims that textbooks all over the world serve a political agenda and have nothing to do with academic objectivity.
The implication behind this statement is clear enough even if he did not come right out and say that education is not about enlightened speculation, but about indoctrination and brainwashing, and that the textbooks for the 12-year national education system would be written the way people want to write them.
If textbooks are intended to serve politics, does that not mean that the authors are nothing other than political hatchet men? To see someone who studies and teaches history openly and almost triumphantly claim that there is no academic objectivity without the slightest bit of remorse makes one wonder what happened to academic conscience.
Under autocracies, dictatorships and communist regimes, it would be closer to the truth to say that the teaching of history is merely a tool for obscuring the truth and brainwashing the masses. Under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Taiwan’s history textbooks have indeed been leaning toward outright myth, lies and distortions of fact, but to say that textbooks anywhere in the world are meant to serve politics and ignore academic objectivity is too bold and irresponsible.
When it comes to attributing responsibility, there is one criterion: The further a society gets from the actual event, the heavier the responsibility to depict it accurately.
Taiwan’s textbooks do not clearly explain who bears most responsibility for the 228 Incident. Investigation revealed that the order given to troops to open fire was passed on by then-Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀), but nothing is said about who issued the order. Can a history book like this, where there are only victims, but no aggressors, heal the wounds caused by the 228 Incident?
In addition, does leaving Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) — who self-immolated to defend the freedom of expression — out of history textbooks imply that freedom of speech was a right bestowed upon the public from above, not something that was fought for?
Politicizing education results in indoctrination, and gives rise to a populace who can process information but lack critical thinking or insight. The brightest members of this demographic become the sycophants and pseudo-intellectuals who prop up autocratic regimes.
Ma, who graduated from Harvard Law School, is a perfect example of these dull-witted stalwarts of the “status quo”: The mention of lifting Martial Law in Taiwan gave him the heebie jeebies; he opposed introducing legislative elections; he opposed direct presidential elections; he opposed the introduction of referendums and he supports the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and the cross-strait trade in services and in goods agreements.
How does his record reflect an academic understanding of the norms of democracy? Anyone in the street knows what lurong (鹿茸) means — the Chinese word for budding deer antlers — but because it was not mentioned in the textbooks he had read, Ma thought the term referred to the fur in deer’s ears. What use is knowledge without common sense?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry