TPP a Trojan horse
Finally, an article depicting the true face of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has appeared in a Taiwanese newspaper.
For at least a year, I have been reading exhortations from Taiwanese media outlets and politicians that the nation must join the TPP, with no reports of the truth about the proposed deal. So the inclusion in the Taipei Times of Joseph Stiglitz’s article on the TPP (“The Trans-Pacific Partnership: the secret corporate takeover,” May 18, page 9) — from an economist who knows just what this Trojan-horse agreement entails — offers a much-needed service for Taiwan and Taiwanese.
For those too busy or disinterested to read the full article, the following excerpt is enough to provide all the information one needs to see through this corporate deception:
“The real intent of these provisions is to impede health, environmental, safety and, yes, even financial regulations meant to protect the US economy and citizens. Companies can sue governments for full compensation for any reduction in their future expected profits resulting from regulatory changes.”
Thank you Taipei Times for finally providing Taiwanese what they need to know about the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
David Martelli
Taitung County
Compost key to future
Kengchi Goah (吳耿志) is perfectly right in his evaluation of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and of higher education in Taiwan (“Shifting to value food production,” May 19, page 8).
I brought computer technology to Taiwan with Hewlett-Packard in 1969 and studied physics at National Taiwan University. My son works at TSMC.
The Japanese saw the potential of Taiwan and wanted to turn it into the breadbasket of Japan. We should go back to this view and make the agricultural field the economy’s main driver.
However, using TSMC-style manufacturing for agriculture as Goah suggests is misguided. We are slowly waking up to the impact of factory farms raising cows, pigs and chickens. Human health pays the price. The same goes for fruit and vegetables. Their health and nutritional content depend on the sun and the natural contribution of good clay soils full of nutrients, most of them unknown to those with doctorates. No LED or chemical fertilizers can get close.
There is a much easier way to bring about an agricultural revolution. Taiwanese produce more than 16,000 tonnes of table scraps a day, most of it burned by huge incinerators producing serious pollution. By composting all of it — which is easy if given the political will — the way I do on my farm at a rate of 2 tonnes a day, we would produce enough of the most nutrient-rich, natural compost to fertilize 10,000 hectares of farmland a year.
Fifty-six percent of farmers in Taiwan try to survive on a monthly income of NT$20,000 per family on small farms totaling 22 percent of all farmland. Meanwhile, the younger generation leaves for the cities and farming is abandoned. This is a major headache for the Ministry of Agriculture.
Take all the potential compost generated by food waste and give it to these small farmers, and their income will jump to NT$200,000 a month, 10 times their actual income. The younger generation will be drawn to the countryside, where the economy lies, and within 60 years, the whole of Taiwan will have an agriculture free of chemical fertilizers and pesticide, as well as a healthy population.
Pierre Loisel
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry