China’s establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has intensified debate about whether a new generation of development banks led by emerging economies is needed to ensure that financing decisions adequately account for principles of environmentally sustainable growth. However, far more important is whether such principles underpin developing nations’ broader capital markets, which have become increasingly central to the international financial system.
The answer, as of now, seems to be yes. Indeed, China and other major emerging economies appear committed to designing financial systems that serve the long-term imperatives of inclusive and sustainable development. However, they cannot create a genuinely inclusive and sustainable global economy by themselves.
Policy-directed investment vehicles, which have grown in number and significance in recent years, are critical to this effort. While the AIIB and the forthcoming New Development Bank, operated by the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), are the most visible internationally, they are only the tip of the iceberg. The world’s two largest development banks — the Brazilian Development Bank and the China Development Bank — together manage about US$1.5 trillion in assets.
Sovereign wealth funds — the assets of which have swelled from just over US$3 trillion in 2007 to more than US$7 trillion today — also have a significant influence on global asset markets. Likewise, monetary authorities have been playing an increasingly active role, with the major central banks’ balance sheets having expanded from about US$5.5 trillion in 2005 to US$13.9 trillion earlier this year.
However, such figures, though large, pale in comparison with the US$305 trillion worth of financial assets held by commercial banks, institutional investors and other private financial institutions and individuals. How these funds are deployed will determine the shape of tomorrow’s economies and the state of the environment on which they depend.
Recent reports commissioned by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) neatly summarize where we are with two key data points: While global investment in renewables increased by 17 percent last year, 116 of 140 countries registered a deterioration in their stock of natural capital. In other words, financial markets are responding to environment-related risks and opportunities, but far too slowly to halt, let alone reverse, the potentially catastrophic damage being wrought by human activity.
This must change. Finance needs to be directed more rapidly and decisively away from natural-resource-intensive and polluting investments and toward green opportunities. While greener economic and industrial policies are vital, they are inadequate; policy and market failures in the financial economy must be addressed as well.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations, despite being the source of modern history’s most devastating financial meltdown, have shown less appetite to advance sustainability as a design principle of their financial systems — the Bank of England’s ongoing prudential review of climate-related risks to the financial sector is a notable exception. This contrasts with the approach of some developing economies, which not only face more immediate environmental and social challenges, but also take a “developmental” view of the financial system’s role.
Consider China, where a task force created by the Peoples’ Bank of China (PBOC) has just unveiled 14 proposals to green the nation’s financial system. The so-called “green finance task force” — convened by the bank’s Research Bureau and the UNEP Inquiry into Design Options for a Sustainable Financial System — initially comprised 40 ministers, regulators, academics and financial actors, supported by international experts. It was recently expanded to include more than 100 institutions, which are working together to create detailed plans for each proposal.
The proposals cover four broad areas: specialized investment vehicles to support green investment, domestically and internationally; fiscal and financial support, including interest subsidies for green loans, incentives for developing the green bond market and better mechanisms for green firms to communicate their environmental performance in equity markets; new financial infrastructure, including carbon markets, a green ratings system and a green investor network; and legal infrastructure, including clearer lender liability provisions, compulsory environmental liability insurance and the disclosure of environmental information
Green finance is at an early stage in China, just as it is in the rest of the world. Fortunately, according to UNEP’s two-year inquiry into policy options for greening financial and capital markets, the movement is gaining traction in emerging nations, such as Brazil, Kenya and Indonesia, as well as in developed economies, like the UK.
China’s recent move marks the beginning of a new phase of its financial-market development, in which green finance goals are central, rather than an add-on, to relevant initiatives. According to PBOC Deputy Governor Pan Gongsheng (潘功勝), green finance will be a “key element” of “the 13th Five-Year Plan for the reform and development of China’s financial sector.”
The current shift toward green finance in developing countries can have a significant international impact. China’s efforts, in particular, could take the world to a tipping point, through their effects on the country’s growing global financial footprint.
International action — from knowledge-sharing to the development of suitable standards and oversight — is vital to advance green finance. Fortunately, progress is being made here, too. UNEP’s work has helped to invigorate a vibrant informal network involving central banks and other policymakers and market actors. Rating agency Standard & Poor’s is integrating climate risks into its sovereign-credit analysis and the G20 recently asked the Financial Stability Board to consider the risks that a possible “carbon bubble” — caused by markets’ overvaluation of fossil-fuel companies’ oil, coal and gas reserves, owing to a failure to account for future limits on extraction and use — pose to the global financial system.
Progressive national leadership and international coalitions — together with more deeply engaged multilateral institutions — are needed to build a more inclusive green global financial system. Only such a system can effectively advance sustainable development.
Ma Jun is head economist of the Research Bureau of the Peoples’ Bank of China. Simon Zadek is codirector of the UN Environment Programme’s Inquiry into Design Options for a Sustainable Financial System.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry