A week at the American Academy in Berlin leaves me with two contradictory feelings: One is that Germany today deserves a Nobel Peace Prize, and the other is that Germany tomorrow will have to overcome its deeply ingrained post-World War II pacifism and become a more serious, activist global power. I say both as a compliment.
On the first point, what the Germans have done in converting almost 30 percent of their electric grid to solar and wind energy from near zero in about 15 years has been a great contribution to the stability of the planet and its climate.
The centerpiece of the German Energiewende, or energy transformation, was an extremely generous “feed-in tariff” that made it a no-brainer for Germans to install solar (or wind) power generators at home and receive a predictable high price for the energy generated off their own rooftops.
There is no denying that the early days of the feed-in tariff were expensive. The subsidies cost billions of euros, paid for through a surcharge on everyone’s electric bill. However, the goal was not simply to buy more renewable energy: It was to create demand that would drive down the cost of solar and wind to make them mainstream, affordable options.
And, in that, the Energiewende has been an undiluted success. With price drops of more than 80 percent for solar and 55 percent for wind, zero-carbon energy is now competitive with fossil fuels in Germany.
“In my view, the greatest success of the German energy transition was giving a boost to the Chinese solar panel industry,” said Ralf Fuecks, president of the Heinrich-Boell-Stiftung, the German Green Party’s political foundation.
“We created the mass market and that led to the increased productivity and dramatic decrease in cost,” he said.
And all this in a country whose northern tip is the same latitude as the southern tip of Alaska.
This is a world-saving achievement. And, happily, as the price fell, the subsidies for new installations also dropped. The Germans who installed solar ended up making money, which is why the program remains popular, except in coal-producing regions.
Today, more than 1.4 million German households and cooperatives are generating their own solar or wind electricity.
“There are now a thousand energy cooperatives operated by private people,” energy economist Claudia Kemfert said.
Green Party parliamentary group vice chairman Oliver Krischer told me: “I have a friend who comes home, and, if the sun is shining, he does not even say hello to his wife. He first goes downstairs and looks at the meter to see what [electricity] he has produced himself.”
“The idea now is that energy is something you can [produce] on your own. It is a new development,” Krishcer said.
And it has created so much pushback against the country’s four major coal and nuclear utilities that one of them, E.On, just split into two companies — one focusing on squeezing the last profits from coal, oil, gas and nuclear, while the other focuses on renewables.
Germans jokingly call them “E.Off” and “E.On.”
One problem: Germany still has tonnes of cheap, dirty lignite coal that is used as backup power for wind and solar, because cleaner natural gas is more expensive and nuclear is being phased out.
So if that is the story on renewable power, how about national power?
Two generations after World War II, Germany’s reticence to project any power outside its borders is deeply ingrained in the political psyche. That is a good thing, given Germany’s past, but it is not sustainable.
There is an impressive weight to Germany today — derived from the quality of its governing institution, its rule of law and the sheer power of its economy built on midsize businesses — that is unique in Europe.
When you talk to German officials about Greece, their main complaint is not about Greek fiscal policy, which is better lately, but about the rot and corruption in Greece’s governing institutions.
The Greeks “could not implement the structural reforms they needed, if they wanted to,” one German financial official said to me. Athens’ institutions are a mess.
With the US less interested in Europe, Britain fading away both from the EU and the last vestiges of its being a global military power, France and Italy economically hobbled and most NATO members shrinking their defense budgets, I do not see how Germany avoids exercising more leadership.
Its economic sanctions are already the most important counter to Russian aggression in Ukraine. In the Mediterranean Sea, where Europe faces a rising tide of refugees — and where Russia and China are holding joint naval exercises this week — Germany will have to catalyze some kind of EU naval response. The relative weight of German power vis-a-vis the rest of Europe just keeps growing, but do not say that out loud here.
A German foreign policy official put their dilemma this way: “We have to get used to assuming more leadership and be aware of how reluctant others are to have Germany lead — so we have to do it through the EU.”
A prediction: Germany will be Europe’s first green, solar-powered superpower. Can those attributes coexist in one country, you ask? They are going to have to.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry