The most common image associated with workplace chemical exposure usually involves a man, perhaps clad in a lab coat or a coverall, carefully interacting with lethal compounds. For decades, however, women have been moving into a host of jobs that bring them into regular contact with toxic chemicals, from hair styling to housekeeping to firefighting.
Several nonprofit health groups including Commonweal, Breast Cancer Action, and Breast Cancer Fund, have joined forces to begin to take on this problem. Working with the San Francisco Fire Department, they recently released a study to determine the health impacts of firefighting on women.
The study was the result of mounting concern at the high incidence of premenopausal breast cancer among women in the fire department. As of 2012, 10 out of 117 female San Francisco firefighters between the ages of 40 and 50 had contracted breast cancer, and one had died. That put the department’s breast cancer rate at 8.5 percent — nearly six times the US average for women in the same age bracket.
Illustration: Lance Liu
The San Francisco initiative is one of a limited body of research that specifically studies the impact of jobs on women’s health. While gender equality has advanced in the workforce ranks, research on the impact different work environments might have on women’s health has often failed to keep up. It is a problem because, for various biological reasons, some workplaces and chemicals may be more dangerous to women than to men.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the US has conducted a Firefighter Cancer Study since 2010, but only began incorporating female subjects in 2012. It has only included a few women — less than 1 percent of total subjects. In the summary of its findings, the institute reported: “In women, there is statistical evidence of excess female bladder and breast cancers, but only bladder cancer mortality and incidence reach significance.”
The report stated that there is little evidence linking female breast cancer to workplace exposure, but noted that longer shifts may be a risk factor. It concluded that the findings on female firefighters should be interpreted cautiously, due to the small sample size and “lack of confirmatory results.”
The San Francisco biomonitoring collaborative will look more closely at the impact of various exposures on women in the hopes of finding ways to protect them from mammary carcinogens. However, while the San Francisco study is groundbreaking, it is still in its infancy, and is unlikely to affect policy or health outcomes for quite some time.
Under existing US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker-protection regulations, manufacturers must supply safety data sheets about the products used in workplaces, and employers must inform and train their workforce accordingly. OSHA also issues guidance on what to do if workers are exposed to specific hazardous compounds, such as cadmium and asbestos.
However, while OSHA’s safety data sheets must cover all the potential dangers of a chemical or material, the agency does not look specifically at gender differences.
Among other differences, women have more fat tissue where some chemicals accumulate. They also tend to have lower body weight, which can reduce the amount of chemical exposure that is safe. Moreover, females have a different balance of hormones than men, which can affect how those hormones interact with some chemicals. In short, workplace chemicals can impact women differently than men, and in some cases may pose a larger threat.
“There’s not a lot of differentiation between genders in the materials we have,” OSHA spokeswoman Laura McGinnis said. “As far as OSHA is concerned, a hazard to a worker is a hazard to a worker, whether it’s a man or a woman.”
Critics argue that OSHA’s perspective does not reflect reality.
“As women have moved into less traditional jobs, the study of the impact those workplaces have on their health has not kept up,” said Nancy Buermeyer, senior policy strategist for the nonprofit Breast Cancer Fund. “OSHA tends to focus on the 32-year-old white male standard and assume exposure is the same. And it’s not.”
Part of the problem is the high cost of regulation. OSHA and its state partners have approximately 2,200 inspectors who are responsible for the safety of 130 million workers — that is one inspector for every 59,000 workers.
Given the size of its job and the paucity of its resources, it is not surprising that OSHA is less focused on regulating workplaces than on ensuring that workers know what they are being exposed to. It requires that manufacturers update and republish their materials if testing on a chemical reveals new information. In the workplace, the agency places the onus on employers to adequately train and inform employees, to ensure that safety data sheets are up to date and to guarantee that OSHA guidance documents are being followed.
OSHA itself does not review safety data sheets unless it receives a complaint. It does, however, issue specific guidance around particular workplace safety issues. The agency’s staff looks for emerging risk trends, and listens to concerns from industry groups, unions and advocacy groups.
A combination of these factors came into play with OSHA’s guidance on toluene, an industrial solvent that is commonly found in nail products.
OSHA has long been aware of toluene’s dangers, which can include memory loss, loss of hearing, loss of appetite, loss of color vision and even death. However, the organization has not historically done much to alert beauty workers, who often come into contact with the chemical, about these dangers. For example, it had not made an effort to ensure that nail salons had safety data sheets or that information was available in multiple languages, which is key given that many nail workers speak English as a second language.
Last year, Women’s Voices for the Earth, a nonprofit organization working to eliminate the use of toxic chemicals, also began working with OSHA to update its guidance to reflect women’s exposure to toluene, particularly nail salon workers.
“We said this is something we really need to worry about with nail workers,” said Alexandra Scranton, the organization’s executive director. “They really heard that, and had us help them change the fact sheets, which were really geared toward male-dominated professions.”
The White House’s initiative on American Asian Pacific Islanders has been working with OSHA, the Environmental Protection Agency and the labor department to create multi-language safety materials and Web resources for nail salon workers.
Across the board, research on occupational health hazards faced by women is hard to come by. An International Agency for Research on Cancer report released in 2007 bore this out. It correlated night shift work with a higher risk for breast cancer, but its guidance on the subject suggested that there was a general indication that shift work is probably carcinogenic to humans, not that it was a particular risk for women.
In reality, night shift work might have specific dangers for women. A study by researchers in Canada found that night shift work has a high correlation with breast cancer in women. By disrupting the body’s circadian rhythms, researchers found, night work upsets the body’s hormonal cycles. The same report correlated painting work and firefighting with significant cancer risks, but did not address how these jobs affected gender-specific ailments like breast cancer and reproductive cancers.
Another example of potential oversight was revealed by a 2012 research review, funded by Health Canada, that found a high cancer risk for women who work in plastic manufacturing. In its conclusion, the study’s authors noted the need for research that takes gender into account.
“Our review indicates that women are at disproportionate risk due to the types of jobs they perform in the plastics industry and their particular biological vulnerabilities,” they stated.
In addition to the female firefighter study, the Breast Cancer Fund will also be releasing a comprehensive report on occupational health for women later this year.
“There hasn’t historically been enough women in these jobs to have statistical relevance, but that’s changing,” Buermeyer said. “A lot of work really needs to be done on occupational health.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this