The death of Cindy Yang (楊又穎), a model and entertainer who allegedly committed suicide after being subjected to cyberbullying, has prompted local celebrities and lawmakers to weigh in on the issue of online bullying, citing their own experiences or vowing to stop the “online rioters.”
While the problem is in need of attention and deliberation in an era in which extensive use of social media amplify the harm of such harassment, the way some public figures commented on the issue following the recent tragedy has obfuscated and polarized the debate.
Pop diva Jody Chiang (江蕙), 54, lamented what she called “the excessive freedom of speech in Taiwan”— implying it had given rise to the cyberbullying that is thought to have contributed to Yang’s suicide.
The remark reminded Taiwanese of action star Jackie Chan (成龍), who has more than once attributed the “mess” in Taiwan to the country “being too free” and called Taiwan’s democracy “a joke.” Many attributed Chan’s unbridled contempt for Taiwan’s political environment to his warm relationship with the Chinese Communist Party and his vested interests in the Chinese market, and it is no less likely that Taiwanese entertainers would hold the same views for the same reason.
However, the disconcerting fact is that the idea of Taiwan being “excessively free” is not only one harbored by entertainers who align themselves with China for economic reasons, but is an everyday sentiment of some, particularly older, Taiwanese.
Young people who identify with the Sunflower movement are especially familiar with that “nostalgic” view, as there was no shortage of similar attacks on the movement and the subsequent activities launched by youthful activists, with some critics even calling for “a return to martial law to bring about a more harmonious society.”
Other celebrities, such as Ho Jong (何戎) and his wife, who are prominent anti-gay-marriage advocates, and Janet Lee (李倩蓉), who recently sparked great controversy over the lack of military discipline following the circulation of a photograph of her inside an Apache helicopter at a restricted base, wasted no time in describing their experiences of being “bullied” online for their actions. Ho’s wife, who supports the denial of civil rights to a group of people based on her religious views, said that people “should not bully others just because they hold opinions different from yours.”
In the political realm, there are Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members who claim to be victims, with the KMT caucus telling a press conference that the “social order” must be restored by amending the law to make “online rioters” stop what they are doing.
It is not hard to imagine how the Internet generation might negatively interpret these developments, from Chiang’s remark advocating self-censorship to the KMT lawmakers venting the party’s grudges against young netizens — with whom its failure to connect is said to have been one reason for the party’s rout in last year’s local elections.
Some netizens have even come to blame those who expressed genuine concerns about cyberbullying and quoted Monica Lewinsky’s recent TED speech on “misdirecting the public opinion.”
Online bullying is a new social problem that is worthy of wide discussion and needs to be dealt with, especially among children and teenagers.
It is therefore most unfortunate to see the debate go so far astray. Further online deliberation and cross-party endorsement will probably be required to close the existing gap born out of distrust.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under