The strongest earthquake of the year, magnitude 6.3, struck on Monday and five aftershocks rocked the nation throughout the day. Fortunately, no major disaster occurred. This year has already seen three earthquakes of magnitude 6 or higher and the Central Weather Bureau has not excluded the possibility that further earthquakes of at least magnitude 6 will take place. It is a certainty that strong earthquakes will continue to hit Taiwan, so the question is: Are people prepared to deal with them?
When there is an earthquake, the first reaction is often to wonder if the nation’s nuclear power plants have been affected, as earthquakes can have disastrous effects on them. If an earthquake destroys a nuclear power plant, the consequences would be unfathomable. Taiwan’s three plants are all close to fault lines, which is completely out of line with international standards, which say that power stations should be built at least 8km from a fault. The Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) is right on a seismogenic fault, and if a magnitude 7 or stronger earthquake were to occur there, the forces generated would far exceed the 0.4G peak ground acceleration that plant is designed to withstand.
The Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is right over two seismogenic faults that pass right under the plant’s main gate. The reactors at the plant are a mere 800m to 1km away from the fault, and their earthquake resistance abilities are questionable.
Magnitude 4 earthquakes have also occurred near Datun Mountain in Yangmingshan National Park, a volcanic area, and constant earthquakes occur in the Taipei basin. In addition, Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) is close to the Jinshan fault and the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant is close to the Kanjiao fault. On the nearby underwater Jinshan fault, there are two volcanoes, and there is another one on the Kanjiao fault.
The nation’s adverse geological environment leads to concerns over nuclear safety during earthquakes and over Taiwan’s negative record for managing its nuclear power stations.
Although chaos has not broken out yet, there are constant minor issues such as a security valve failure that tripped one of the water coolant pumps in the first reactor core at the Ma-anshan plant in December 2013.
Last year, three screws were found to have fallen out of an inspection instrument during an annual maintenance inspection at the Guosheng plant’s second reactor, one of which still has not been found. Such incidents are worrying.
Until the nuclear power plants have been decommissioned, the government must improve nuclear safety management, controls and procedures, as well as earthquake resistance at nuclear power plants. Construction has already been halted on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮), and the other three plants must be decommissioned according to plan.
There is strong nationwide public support for the creation of a nuclear-free homeland, but that requires complementary measures, such as alternative energy sources, and complementary economic and environmental protection measures. Speeding up the development of alternative energy sources, such as shale oil, solar power, geothermal heating — along with the development of energy-saving measures — are necessary complementary measures.
There is only one Taiwan and it would not be able to withstand a nuclear disaster like the one that occurred at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under