Though liberated from the confines of jail cells in western Beijing, the five young women’s rights activists who have won broad international support, including from US presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton and other political leaders, remain criminal suspects in the eyes of the police and the Chinese judicial system.
For at least one year, the women cannot travel without informing the police, their lawyers said. They could be detained again at any time or called into a police station for interrogation.
Any further activist campaigns or work with nongovernmental organizations could mean more jail time for them. On Tuesday, the husband of Wu Rongrong (武嶸嶸), one of the women, said in a telephone interview that he was not sure what Wu planned to do with the advocacy group she had founded in the eastern city of Hangzhou.
Illustration: June Hsu
The women have been released on bail because prosecutors have not yet brought charges against them, as the police had wanted. However, the continuing pressure and scrutiny on their activities means the security forces under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who is also head of the Chinese Communist Party, have again tightened the vise around civic discourse and action, even over issues that do not overtly threaten the party.
More than any other case since Xi rose to power in late 2012, the ordeal of the so-called Feminist Five gives a clear look at the dyspeptic and hostile view that Xi and other Chinese leaders have of civil society. It also reveals the lengths those officials will go to constrict grassroots activism, even at the expense of international good will.
CHILLING
Public condemnations by US leaders and other prominent figures over the women’s detentions might have contributed to a high-level decision to release them on bail. However, the Beijing police’s relentless push for criminal charges and the fact that the women were held for five weeks despite the international uproar show that the party was willing to tolerate China taking a hit to its global image in order to send a chilling message to Chinese activists, scholars and human rights advocates said.
“Since their actions were so successful in drawing public attention and in influencing public policy, the ‘sensitive’ label that will now be put on this type of campaign will likely set back China’s women’s rights movement, at least for some time,” said Maya Wang (王瑪雅), an Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch. “Sadly, the five’s release does not indicate a change of view by the government towards civil society activists: It still treats them as criminals, rather than as partners in solving pressing social problems.”
The women — Li Tingting (李婷婷), 25; Zheng Churan (鄭楚然), 25; Wei Tingting (韋婷婷), 26; Wang Man (王曼), 33; and Wu, 30 — are up-and-coming leaders in a new generation of feminists pushing for gender equality, an area in which China still trails Western nations by significant measures. The question is whether these women, their feminist compatriots and advocates involved in other causes will curb their activities out of fear. The five women in particular would run a high risk of being prosecuted.
“In keeping with the Xi Jinping government’s extreme hostility towards independent civil society, a formal prosecution will serve the dual purposes of discouraging activism — no matter how legal, no matter how mild, no matter whether the issue has been discussed in the state press — and of leaving people wondering about where the red lines are really drawn in challenging the government,” said Sophie Richardson, China director of Human Rights Watch.
CLAMPDOWNS
Anxiety among activists has been building for months. Chinese officials are moving to pass a draft law proposed by the Ministry of Public Security that would impose much stricter regulations on foreign nongovernmental organizations and their Chinese partners. Officials suspect those types of groups of propagating the kinds of ideas they believe led to the so-called color revolutions in former Soviet nations and to the recent Arab rebellions.
Police officers have raided the offices of some grassroots groups, including Yirenping, a nationwide organization that advocates equal rights for people with HIV, hepatitis and physical disabilities. Several of the detained women have close ties to the group, which had been tolerated by officials for several years, albeit with occasional harassment by the authorities. On Tuesday, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said at a news conference that Yirenping “will be punished because it is suspected of violating the law.” Files, laptops and desktop computers were seized when the police raided the Beijing Yirenping Center in late March.
“The raid of Yirenping’s office surprised me,” said Lu Jun (陸軍), a founder of the Beijing center. “It’s obvious that recently there has been a significant shift in the authorities’ policies.”
Lu said it was notable that the women jailed for five weeks were all members of nongovernmental organizations, while other women detained starting March 6 over their planned campaign against sexual harassment who were not members of such groups were quickly released.
He added that the arrests of the five women were not “isolated, incidental events” but were on a continuum of clampdowns on nongovernmental organizations that intensified about a year ago.
Maya Wang compared the crackdown on the women to that on the New Citizens Movement, a grassroots campaign inspired by a prominent rights lawyer, Xu Zhiyong (許志永), that had advocated transparency in government before being crushed by the Xi administration. Xu was sentenced in January 2014 to four years in prison for “organizing a crowd to disturb public order” — the same charge the police wanted prosecutors to bring against the five women. Maya Wang, based in Hong Kong, said that the cases showed that even when activists are pushing for policy changes consistent with those publicly supported by senior Chinese officials, the officials want to ensure they are the only ones defining the agenda.
STREET ACTIONS
“The leadership does not want any civic initiatives that it cannot control,” she said. “The authorities want to be the one at the driver’s seat when it comes to reforms. In other words, top-down reforms are the only reforms acceptable, whether they are legal reforms, economic reforms, anti-corruption campaigns and so on; but bottom-up initiatives are treated with utmost suspicion, more so than it has ever been.”
Officials have also grown more wary of grassroots activists because of their ability to use social networking tools and mobile phone apps to organize crowds quickly and in unpredictable ways. The Feminist Five, for example, had since 2011 directed theatrical street actions ranging from occupying men’s public restrooms as a way of pushing for more toilets for women, to wearing wedding dresses with fake blood to draw attention to domestic abuse. They had been using WeChat, a popular messaging app, to organize the anti-sexual harassment campaign to be carried out nationwide around March 8, International Women’s Day.
Wang Zheng, a professor of history and women’s studies at the University of Michigan, said she first saw word of the campaign on WeChat, which feminists have used to form many groups and could be used to mobilize people.
Wang Zheng is among those who see some hopeful signs in how the case of the five women unfolded. She said Tuesday in a series of e-mail exchanges that the fact that they were released rather than charged with crimes “shows clearly that there were officials in the system who pushed very hard towards a positive solution.”
She added that “a core group of young activists who have the leadership capacity and deep commitment to social justice is emerging in this historical event.”
“That said, I am fully aware of the grave challenges that confront Chinese feminists,” she said. “As long as nongovernmental organizations’ activism for advocating and implementing laws relating to gender equality or any other issue is defined as criminal, there will be no safe zone for feminists as well as activists working in other realms for social justice.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry