There are many news outlets and there is a lot of news. Although people say this means that facts gradually become clearer, news manipulation is also worsening as facts are drowned out by never-ending wars of words.
For example, broadcaster Clara Chou (周玉蔻) has been sued for slander by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) after she said Gou had made a donation of NT$300 million (US$9.6 million) to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) during last year’s nine-in-one elections.
Chou said she had received that information from Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). Ko on Monday told a court that he had heard it from Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) ahead of the mayoral election.
Ker then immediately held a press conference at the Legislative Yuan to say that the money was a donation by Gou to the administration of then-Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) to handle expenses for the Taipei pavilion at the 2010 World Fair. Hau has also said that Gou donated funds to help build the pavilion, which implies that Ker is right.
It thus seems that Ko may have misunderstood Ker, while others willfully made biased interpretations, and that this was the cause of the controversy.
However, Ko only said that someone had given his opponent NT$300 million, without specifying whether by “opponent” he meant Lien or Hau, so it is difficult to say that Ko heard or said something wrong. This turns the focus to Chou, who was the one who said Gou was the donor and Lien the recipient.
The whole affair now appears a farce, with facts changing as they are circulated without being verified, leading to confusion over who did or said what. This draws attention to the frivolous and irresponsible way in which public officials handle public affairs. When news hits the media, those involved behave as if it has nothing to do with them and they are only waiting around to enjoy the show while unsubstantiated rumors cause public concern.
Many media outlets behave irresponsibly, reporting anything journalists hear without any fact checking. Talk show pundits are veritable rumor machines who do nothing to help clarify issues while causing social divisions to grow ever wider.
Gou is to take the witness stand, and one can only hope that he will clarify the ins and outs of this whole mess and put an end to the ruckus once and for all.
Although it seems that the whole affair was a misunderstanding, it must not be forgotten that the reason it has attracted so much attention is not the money itself, but rather the connections between government and industry hidden behind such a huge political donation. Such connections are a hotbed for corruption and distort the fair and reasonable distribution of public resources.
A look at the strange conditions in the Taipei City Government’s contracts with Farglory Land Development Co in connection to the construction of the Taipei Dome and with Radium Life Tech Co in connection to the MeHAS City project in New Taipei City’s Sindian District (新店) makes it very difficult to believe that everything is on the up and up.
Open, transparent and democratic politics requires that murky political donations must not be tolerated. The Chou-Gou case must not be allowed to divert attention, as inappropriate political donations must continue to be investigated.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry