At the upcoming Summit of the Americas in Panama City, business and government leaders will discuss the economic challenges facing the Western Hemisphere, especially how to support inclusive growth following the commodities bonanza that endured for the better part of the last decade. Any strategy will have to account for an inescapable global phenomenon: the so-called “Second Machine Age.”
Massachusetts Institute of Technology economists Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, among others, identify the Second Machine Age with the rise of new automation technologies and artificial intelligence. While optimists predict that these innovations will usher in an era of unprecedented abundance, less sanguine analysts estimate that nearly half of all jobs currently performed by humans are vulnerable to replacement by robots and increasingly sophisticated software.
Advanced technologies are already making inroads into some of Latin America’s principal industries. For example, automakers, which employ hundreds of thousands of people across the region, are rapidly deploying robots that are more efficient and precise than humans. In South America’s grain belt, GPS-guided machinery is diminishing the need for farmhands, even as output increases.
Service industries, which already account for two-thirds of all jobs in Latin America, are particularly vulnerable. One Brazilian startup’s tax-management software, for example, can perform in seconds operations that would demand thousands of billable hours from an army of accountants. Other sectors that currently account for a large share of employment in lower-income countries — including apparel, light manufacturing, logistics and call centers — are forecast to undergo increasing automation.
Is Latin America ready for this epochal change? For a region that arrived late to the Industrial Revolution, this is not a trivial question — especially at a time when many Latin American economies are facing daunting challenges, stemming from the end of the commodities boom.
Most notably, Latin American and Caribbean economies must address their productivity gap — the result of their failure, with few exceptions, to boost productivity significantly since the 1960s. As they adjust to lower prices for oil, metals and grain — and the eventual upturn in global interest rates — they will have to pursue productivity-enhancing reforms. Ensuring that the region’s already-skewed income distribution does not worsen — and, indeed, improves — is also essential.
The good news is that Latin America’s agendas for technology, productivity and inclusivity overlap. For example, improvements in education and the encouragement of formal employment advance all three objectives. However, such reforms will take years to bear fruit. In the meantime, four areas in the private sector can contribute.
First, companies can boost their own human capital by providing on-the-job training — a proven tactic that remains rare in Latin America. There has been some progress: The government agency Uruguay XXI’s “finishing schools” initiative offers subsidies to export-oriented companies to train staff in specific skills, such as English, and help them to master new technologies.
Second, Latin American firms should increase their investment in research and development (R&D). Companies in the region devote about 0.4 percent of their sales, on average, to R&D — far less than the 1.9 percent average for countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Latin American businesses can change this by emulating their counterparts in the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo, which have research contracts with leading public universities. Such links, common throughout North America, have helped to lift Sao Paulo’s R&D spending to 1.6 percent of GDP — higher than that of Spain or Italy.
Third, Latin American companies can help to improve education — often much faster than the government can implement effective reforms. In Peru, one businessman commissioned the creation of an entirely new education model. Four years later, Carlos Rodriguez-Pastor has established 23 Innova schools, serving 13,500 students, where teachers’ knowledge and skills are continuously updated. He hopes to build a 200-school network in the coming years.
Finally, Latin American business leaders should support budding entrepreneurs, who lack not only the capital, but also the support system needed to turn their ideas into viable ventures. Local shortcomings force too many innovators — such as the Guatemalan Luis von Ahn, who co-developed CAPTCHA, the word puzzles that Web sites use to ensure that users are human — to move abroad.
Von Ahn, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University in the US, has already sold one innovative company to Google. That company, reCAPTCHA, harnesses CAPTCHAs to have people decode a word from, say, a newspaper article that a computer scanner has been unable to recognize and digitize. He is now working on Duolingo, a free language-learning platform that aspires to coordinate the translation of Wikipedia’s entire content into several major languages.
Latin America cannot afford to lose gifted innovators like Von Ahn. Established business leaders should help mentor and finance these visionaries, enabling them to flourish at home so that they do not set up shop abroad.
For each of these challenges, there are successful models that can be adapted and replicated. With diligence, persistence and intelligence, Latin America may yet make the most of the coming technological era — and ensure that its benefits are more widely shared.
Luis Alberto Moreno is president of the Inter-American Development Bank and a member of the World Economic Forum’s foundation board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.