For the past 15 years, Venezuela has been mired in crisis, characterized by wasteful government spending, rampant corruption, growing authoritarianism, relentless human rights violations and now economic collapse. However, beyond the occasional sharp word from former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, the periodic expropriation of a foreign company without adequate compensation and some minor meddling in the elections of neighboring countries, the crisis barely registered abroad. This is no longer the case.
Earlier this month, US President Barack Obama officially classified Venezuela as an “extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” and ordered sanctions against seven officials, thereby stoking bilateral tensions. However, while the crisis in Venezuela undoubtedly has far-reaching implications, the precise motivation behind Obama’s decision remains unclear.
One possible explanation stems from the enduring passivity of Venezuela’s regional neighbors toward its plight. Countries like Brazil, Mexico, Chile and Colombia have remained largely silent in the face of recurring abuses by Chavez and his successor, Nicolas Maduro, including the imprisonment of opposition leaders, repression of public protests and media censorship. Obama may be trying to force these countries to choose sides: Either support Venezuela explicitly or support the US in opposing its leaders’ policies.
More important, Obama could be trying to drive a wedge between Venezuela and Cuba at a time when the Cuban leadership is keenly interested in improving its relationship with the US. As it stands, Cuba will sink without Venezuela — unless, of course, it finds another lifeline. The US — which in placing itself in direct opposition to Venezuela has also highlighted the country’s fragility — may be an increasingly appealing option. And, indeed, many experts anticipate the eventual normalization of Cuba-US relations, despite short-term political obstacles.
IMPEDE EFFORTS
In any case, Maduro has not taken Obama’s affront lightly. Employing the age-old tactic of exaggerating the threat of external aggression — in this case, from what Maduro, like Chavez before him, refers to as the “empire” — to justify internal repression, he has compelled the legislative assembly to enact a law enabling him to govern temporarily by decree.
To reinforce the image that a US invasion may be imminent, Maduro has mobilized the army and militia for war maneuvers. Last year, when Panama requested that the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States dedicate a regular meeting to the Venezuelan crisis, Maduro severed diplomatic relations for four months, accusing the Panamanians of joining the US in an “open conspiracy” against him.
This approach has helped Maduro obtain the support of the Union of South American Nations — a new regional bloc that issues harmless pronouncements. However, he is not done yet. He is now preparing to transform the upcoming Summit of the Americas in Panama — which Obama and, for the first time, Cuban President Raul Castro are expected to attend — into a rhetorical witch hunt against “Yankee interventionism” in his country.
Maduro seems to hope that such agitation will impede efforts by Obama and Castro to begin normalizing relations at the summit. As it stands, it is possible that they could meet bilaterally to negotiate the establishment of embassies in each other’s capitals, with the US potentially even removing Cuba from the list of countries that it counts as supporters of international terrorism.
However, with the US engaged in such a severe political confrontation with Venezuela, progress would effectively require that Cuba abandon its unconditional support for the Venezuelan regime. Given Cuba’s desperation to attract investment, tourism and trade, such an outcome is certainly plausible.
ECONOMIC COLLAPSE
Of course, Cuba is not the only country facing the stark choice between intervention in Venezuela and support for Chavismo. Countries like Brazil, Mexico and Chile — all of which back neither alternative, and have rightly applauded the detente between Cuba and the US — must also consider their options ahead of the Panama summit.
Will these countries’ leaders join Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, Bolivia’s Evo Morales, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa and Argentina’s Cristina Fernandez in supporting Maduro, backing Obama into a corner in Panama? Or will they disable the trap Maduro is trying to set, perhaps even reprising Spanish King Juan Carlos I’s 2007 outburst to Chavez: “Why don’t you shut up?”
Amid these questions, one thing is certain: Latin America’s larger countries cannot continue to ignore Venezuela’s crisis. If the country’s economic collapse — the consequence of incompetent governance and the sharp fall in oil prices — is not enough to spur them to choose a side, Obama’s extreme maneuver will be. Their time for indifference is over.
Jorge Castaneda, a former foreign minister of Mexico, is a professor of politics and Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China