Of all of the investments needed to achieve sustainable development, none is more important than a quality education for every child. In a knowledge-based world economy, a good education is vital for finding decent work; achieving good health; building functioning communities; developing the skills to be a dependable parent; and growing up to be an engaged and responsible citizen.
Indeed, it is no surprise that the most brutish and violent groups in the world, such as Nigeria’s Boko Haram, attack education. And it was right on the mark to award the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize to Malala Yousufzai, the Pakistani teenager shot by the Taliban for her brave advocacy of girls’ education.
When the world’s governments launch the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in September, they will rightly put education for all children at the forefront, alongside ending extreme poverty, hunger, and death from preventable and treatable causes. Yet, while many poor countries have increased domestic financing for education, the international community has not yet done its part. Aid for education remains too low and too fragmented.
In advance of adopting the SDGs, at the Conference on Financing for Development in July, the world has the chance to put real resources behind the Education SDG. The three major types of partners convening in Addis Ababa — governments, philanthropists and top companies — should pool resources to enable impoverished countries to scale up education, especially at the pre-K and secondary levels. The time has come to create a Global Fund for Education (GFE) to ensure that even the world’s poorest children have the chance to receive a quality education at least through secondary school.
TRANSFORMATIVE
This is how malaria, AIDS and vaccine-preventable diseases have been battled successfully in the past 15 years. The US, the UK, Norway, Sweden and other governments teamed up with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, private companies like Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Ericsson, Sumitomo Chemical and others to ensure that life-saving vaccines, medicines and diagnostics could reach the poorest of the poor. The results have been remarkable: Millions of lives have been saved, and economic growth has been boosted.
We must now do the same for education. Though access to primary schooling has expanded dramatically over the past two decades, a transformative breakthrough in quality learning and secondary education has remained out of reach — until now. The spread of computers, mobile phones and broadband coverage to the poorest regions of the world could — and should — ensure that every child in low-income countries has access to the same trove of online information and quality learning materials as children in high-income countries.
Scaling up the use of information and communications technology (ICT), together with improved access to educational innovations, trained teachers and village education workers and better measurement of learning outcomes, would enable low and middle-income countries to create high-quality education systems within 15 years. In the meantime, students in impoverished rural schools that currently lack books, electricity and trained teachers would be connected online — via solar panels and wireless broadband — to quality educational materials, free online courses and other schools, thereby closing a resource gap that, until recently, seemed insurmountable.
FINANCING GAP
The world even has the organizational leadership to make this possible. The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) is a worldwide coalition of governments and non-governmental organizations that has been working for more than a decade with the world’s poorest countries to help them scale up quality education.
Yet, despite the GPE’s tremendous success in encouraging poor countries to mobilize their own budget resources to expand the reach and quality of their educational programs, rich countries have not adequately supported this effort by closing the financing gap these countries face. The GPE should be supported to help build a true global fund for education to ensure that every low-income country that puts in place an effective national strategy and domestic financing would have international support to accomplish its goals.
The additional financing required is modest. UNESCO recently estimated the annual education “financing gap” of low and lower-middle-income countries — to cover education up through lower secondary school — to be around US$22 billion. Ensuring the scale-up of upper-secondary school and ICT access might raise the needed annual sum to around US$40 billion, with detailed cost estimates still to be made. Such aid would be needed only until today’s poor countries achieve enough economic progress to cover the education bill on their own.
That US$40 billion might seem like a lot of money, but consider this: The world’s richest 80 people have an estimated net worth of around US$2 trillion dollars. If they would devote just 1 percent of their net worth each year, they would cover half the global financial need.
RHETORIC TO REALITY
Facebook, Google, Ericsson, Huawei, Samsung, Microsoft, Cisco and other ICT giants could cover at least another US$10 billion per year, in cash and in kind. A few forward-looking governments could then close the remaining US$10 billion gap. As we have seen with immunization, this is the kind of partnership that is needed to take the SDGs from rhetoric to reality.
The beauty of a new GFE is that, once it got underway, it would quickly attract supporters from around the world. Arab governments would want to ensure that all Arabic-speaking children receive a decent ICT-backed education; Brazil and Portugal would surely contribute to ensure that Africa’s many Portuguese speakers benefit from scaled-up education systems. Innovative high-tech companies would scramble to put their learning tools in front of the world’s children. Local universities would train teachers and villagers on how to maximize the potential of these new technologies.
The stars — the SDGs, the ICT giants, mobile broadband, online learning and philanthropists — are aligning for such a scenario. A GFE, announced at the Conference on Financing for Development, would be the best news possible for today’s children everywhere and a dazzling inauguration for the SDGs.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. He is also special adviser to the UN secretary-general on the Millennium Development Goals.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry