The Kaohsiung City Government is planning to pass an ordinance on the management of the city’s existing industrial pipelines that would require that companies laying pipelines in the city move their headquarters there. This is a direct challenge to the central government and the companies involved in last year’s deadly pipeline explosions. Increasing tensions over the decision are likely to follow.
The city government’s anger has grown over decades: As the center for Taiwan’s petrochemical industry, Kaohsiung has long suffered from air and water pollution caused by the industry and the safety threat posed by underground pipelines.
However, while their plants are in Kaohsiung, the companies’ headquarters are in Taipei. This means that most of the tax revenue goes to Taipei. As Kaohsiung has experienced a long period of financial difficulty, this is something its residents find hard to swallow.
The city has repeatedly asked the central government for compensation, but there has been little response. Last year’s explosions once again highlighted the issue, giving the city government an impetus to engineer a showdown with the petrochemical industry and central government.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs initiated talks on the development of the petrochemical industry and the pipelines, but progress has been slow. As far as the companies are concerned, shifting their headquarters to Kaohsiung is not only a matter of relocating offices, it also involves moving staff, and many of the companies have little interest in complying.
The ministry says the city’s proposal will affect the companies’ property and business rights, and violates the “principle of inappropriate connections,” according to which government departments should only consider factors related to the matter at hand and disregard factors unrelated to the intended effect of their exercise of power.
The ministry will submit the city’s plan to the Cabinet for reference and if the Cabinet decides that the decision was unconstitutional, it could, based on Article 30 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法), inform the Kaohsiung City Government in writing that the city’s decision has been annulled. If that were to happen, the city could ask the Judicial Yuan for an interpretation.
The ministry has criticized the city’s demand that the owners of existing pipelines must move their headquarters to Kaohsiung before the end of next year to be allowed to continue to use those pipelines, and that the maintenance of the pipelines is the operational responsibility of these companies, even though the city says that this has nothing to do with the location of corporate headquarters.
By trying to force companies to relocate to
Kaohsiung, the city is violating the concept of inappropriate connections in administrative law and exerting a great deal of influence over the companies’ use of property and their overall economic development, which could be a violation of the constitutional protection of property and business rights, the ministry said.
Both Kaohsiung and the ministry are waving law books around as if preparing for a legal battle, but the dispute may not go that far. It is more likely that the city government is trying to use the threat to bring about peace. By raising the issue’s visibility, it is forcing the central government and the industry back to the negotiating table.
While the pipeline issue remains unresolved,
Kaohsiung residents remain fearful that they are living over ticking time bombs. The city government might not intend to fight a legal battle with the central government and petrochemical industry, but the question is whether the latter two are getting the message.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under