The Lunar New Year holiday is over and the nation has officially entered into the home stretch of next year’s presidential race.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) already has its candidate and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has yet to make its final selection. Whomever they choose, it is shaping up to be a close race and one with plenty of variables.
From many perspectives, next year is shaping up to be a watershed year and unlike any previous elections.
The playing field is more level and voters are better able to analyze candidates. After suffering through two terms of the bungling President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration, voters are wiser and realize that substance and performance are far more important than image.
Voters also have a clearer perception of the direction that they want the nation to take in its relationship with China. The only legacy that Ma has left the KMT candidates is that they should distance themselves from him.
Similarly, social instincts of the public have been roused; stronger in the sense of their role in a democracy, they realize protests are a viable form of action and they certainly will not give future governments the benefit of the doubt.
The DPP has not only made a strong recovery from their poor performance in the 2008 and 2012 elections, but if last year’s nine-in-one elections are any indication, they have gained a clear edge for the future.
VIABLE CANDIDATE
The voters are choosing from the ranks of what can be called a second-generation democracy (read post-1996 candidates) from both sides. Further, these voters have a much clearer idea of what they feel the nation needs and they have had a good chance to see how the current candidates have so far measured up to that task as well as how much baggage they are bringing with them.
On the KMT side, this presents a clear problem. Whom should they put forth? Ma has not fostered much new talent during his term of office: Yes men and cronies too often filled the ranks of his officials.
Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) would normally be a potential presidential candidate, but he has his own baggage. In the eyes of many, he has the reputation of being a wheeler-dealer and party foot soldier. Those who could profit from such actions support him, but that has its limits.
Also, having been selected by Ma in 2012 might have initially helped salvage his public career after losing the Kaohsiung mayoral race in 1998, but that now has become a liability. Wu would be a limited and bad choice for the KMT in these new and changing times.
Another likely KMT candidate would be Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who has been president of the Legislative Yuan since 1999 and has a reputation of being able to work with both parties. However, Wang will be 75 years old by the time the elections take place.
True, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was 73 years old when he ran and won in 1996, but Lee had already proven himself in directing the nation for eight years.
Wang recently survived being expelled from the KMT; he could be a potential vice presidential candidate, but confidence in his leading the nation in the expected future economic and cross-strait turbulence would not be a strong suit.
Former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) could continue the tradition of all elected presidents first being mayor of Taipei, but Hau has baggage as well. His eight years as mayor were at best lackluster and saw plenty of scandal.
His father, former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村), brings pro-China unification baggage to the presidential race. This is not something the party needs in its attempt to appeal to a majority vote in the nation. Running for the legislature might be a better choice for Hau Pei-tsun — with the hopes that he could possibly distinguish himself there in the future.
That leaves the KMT with one remaining viable candidate of note, namely New Taipei City Mayor and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). Chu has the advantage of not having been too long under the scrutiny of the public spotlight.
He also is the party’s chairman, and in that role he recently made a smart move in declaring that the party would not appeal the case for the expulsion of Wang. This has not only helped party unity for the upcoming race — where they will need every man, woman and child on their side — but it also assures the loyalty of Wang at this crucial time.
True, Chu’s recent mayoral victory was far from convincing, and Chu promised he would not run for president next year, but such promises are easily overridden when party needs demand it. The KMT choices are limited for next year, but lacking any primaries except that of the party, Chu seems the best choice.
NUMEROUS UNKNOWNS
Given the lack of strong candidates in the KMT, it would seem for the DPP that the race for president is theirs to lose. Their sole candidate DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has already been tested in her 2012 election defeat. She knows the campaign trail well and is the only candidate to submit their name in the primary.
However, though Tsai had been unopposed in the party primary, this does not mean that running for president will be a walk in the park. The DPP is a notoriously divided party; united in opposition, but after that divided in policies, leadership and goals. Tsai will have a difficult time both keeping the party together and navigating the needs of the special interest social action groups that have recently arisen.
This presidential race has numerous unknowns that are set to keep it interesting and give pundits plenty to talk about. In either party, who will be the vice-presidential candidate?
Also, what about the Legislative Yuan? The KMT has always had control of the legislature. The DPP must look not only at gaining the presidency, but gaining a majority in the Legislative Yuan as well. The Legislative Yuan adds a whole different dimension, as independent social action figures have their own agenda.
Things there are still shaping up as parties ponder not only who should represent them, but also who should be appointed as legislators-at-large.
All things considered, next year’s presidential election is set to be far from dull.
Jerome Keating is a commentator in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.