Tue, Feb 17, 2015 - Page 9 News List

Breaking the stalemate of Europe’s climate change policy

Agreeing on a balanced portfolio of energy solutions has proved difficult, but carbon capture and storage means ‘sustainable growth’ is not necessarily a dirty idea

By Graeme Sweeney

Europe has a strong tradition as a leader in the fight against climate change. However, as of late the continent has reached an ideological impasse over how to address the problem, with environmental sustainability and economic growth often portrayed as being mutually exclusive. If Europe is to remain an environmental leader, as well as a center of innovation and competitiveness, it will have to abandon its ideological rigidness and embrace realistic, pragmatic solutions that can deliver environmental benefits without sacrificing economic development.

The challenges posed by climate change are real, and the consequences of inaction are impossible to ignore. At the same time, there is a growing demand for energy and a desperate need for a long-term exit from the ongoing economic crisis. There is no single, easy solution that addresses both of these imperatives. Reining in global warming while ensuring economic growth would require a balanced portfolio of solutions, including renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. Essential among such solutions is carbon capture and storage.

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology captures carbon dioxide at the source of its emission, compresses it, and stores it permanently underground. In doing so, it provides an important bridge between our modern economy, which relies heavily on carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and a future in which carbon dioxide emissions are greatly reduced. This provides the means for maintaining a competitive industrial sector while simultaneously combating global warming.

To be sure, as with any innovation, there are questions about the technology’s viability. Some question the scale of the investment needed to install and maintain the systems necessary for capturing and storing carbon dioxide. However, it is important to note that these costs pale in comparison with the far greater costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions without CCS. According to the International Energy Agency, for example, a 10-year delay in deploying CCS would increase the cost of decarburizing the power sector by 750 billion euros (US$856.6 billion).

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been unequivocal in its insistence that reducing carbon dioxide emissions and diminishing dependence on fossil fuels is more urgent than ever. It has made it clear that CCS, the only technology that can capture at least 90 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions from the world’s largest producers, must be a part of the solution.

CONCRETE ACTION

Beyond Europe’s borders, governments and businesses are already forging ahead. In Canada, the world’s first full-scale CCS project, Boundary Dam, came onstream in October last year, proving that the technology is viable and ready to be deployed. The United Arab Emirates has initiated the world’s first large-scale CCS project in the iron and steel sector. China continues to show great interest in the technology, and is collaborating with the US to develop its CCS capabilities.

Europe cannot afford to lag behind. Energy-intensive industries directly support 4 million jobs across the continent. Investing in CCS would help preserve Europe’s economic base by securing and creating jobs and protecting vital industries. It would help to realize a vision of Europe that supports both sustainability and growth — a vision that is clearly in line with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s priorities of creating jobs, sustaining growth and developing a competitive energy union.

This story has been viewed 3980 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top