A push by Japan to correct perceived bias in accounts of the country’s wartime past is creating a row that risks muddling the positive message in a mammoth public relations campaign to win friends abroad.
The PR campaign, which has a budget of more than US$500 million, comes as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe aims to adopt a less apologetic stance on Japan’s actions before and during World War II and ease the fetters imposed on defense policy by Japan’s post-war, pacifist constitution.
History is hardly the sole focus of the public relations program. Many of the funds will be used for soft-power initiatives to cultivate “pro-Japan” foreigners, such as supporting Japanese studies at universities and setting up “Japan House” centers to promote the “Japan Brand.”
However, the government is also targeting wartime accounts by overseas textbook publishers and others that it sees as incorrect and damaging to Japan’s image.
One such effort has already sparked a backlash.
Nineteen historians from US universities have written a letter of protest against a recent request by the Japanese government to publisher McGraw Hill Education to revise its account of “comfort women,” the term used in Japan for those forced to work in Japanese military brothels.
The request was rejected.
“We stand with the many historians in Japan and elsewhere who have worked to bring to light the facts about this and other atrocities of World War II. We practice and produce history to learn from the past,” says the letter, a copy of which will be carried in the March edition of the American Historical Association’s newsletter.
“We therefore oppose the efforts of states or special interests to pressure publishers or historians to alter the results of their research for political purposes,” it added.
Abe himself has signaled support for the more aggressive PR push.
“Being modest does not receive recognition in the international community, and we must argue points when necessary,” he recently told a parliamentary panel.
The effort comes at a touchy time as Asia marks the 70th anniversary of World War II’s end with bitter memories not yet laid to rest, especially in China and North and South Korea.
After a decade of shrinking spending on public diplomacy, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs won a total of ¥70 billion (US$590 million) for strategic communications in an extra budget for 2014/2015 and the initial budget for the next year from April — up from just ¥20 billion in the initial 2014/2015 budget.
Many politicians and officials worry that Japan has been outmaneuvered by the aggressive public diplomacy of regional rivals China and South Korea.
“Many countries are investing hugely in this field and we feel we were not investing enough,” a Japanese foreign ministry official said.
Conservatives have welcomed the bigger budget, but want priority placed on correcting perceived errors about history.
“When we see lots of misunderstanding or prejudice against Japan’s history, we’d like to at least set the record straight,” said Yoshiko Sakurai, a journalist and head of the Japan Institute for National Fundamentals, a conservative think tank.
“We have already lost [the information war]. Now we have to recover,” she said in an interview.
Aware of the danger of a backlash, diplomats seem to have mitigated pressure to make the “Japan House” centers — to be set up first in London, Los Angeles and Sao Paulo late next year — beachheads to market an official view of history.
Instead, the facilities could provide what one bureaucrat called a “platform for balanced discussion” on controversial topics, for example, by sponsoring seminars.
However, conservative politicians want bolder steps.
“We are half-satisfied. By mobilizing all means, we must strengthen Japan’s information strategy ... so that in a real sense, we can have [others] properly understand what is good about Japan,” said Liberal Democratic Party Japanese Legislator Yoshiaki Harada, who heads a party committee on improving Japan’s communication strategy.
Experts said government efforts to seek changes in historical accounts would be counter-productive, since it would keep the issue of Japan’s wartime past in public focus.
“Dragging people into a long discussion about history ... seems like they are going to brand Japan with that atrocity in terms of its image,” Dartmouth College professor Jennifer Lind said. “It’s a losing battle.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations