Independent Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) unique, populist style — known in local political circles as the “Ko phenomenon”— is still very much in the ascendancy, with many of his remarks having been conferred the status of “Ko-isms.” His tone is usually witty and humorous, and his ideas on governance and political tactics are very much his own individual style. Furthermore, Ko has a track record of wading into sensitive subjects and making alarming statements.
Ko’s comments in US magazine Foreign Policy have attracted a great deal of debate in Taiwan. When asked about culture, Ko cited the experience of the four Chinese-speaking regions — Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and China — saying that, “the longer the colonization, the more advanced a place is. It’s rather embarrassing. Singapore is better than Hong Kong; Hong Kong is better than Taiwan; Taiwan is better than the [Chinese] mainland.”
The phrase “the longer the colonization, the more advanced a place is” touches upon different ideological interpretations of history prevalent in Taiwanese society. Critics say this is tantamount to extolling the virtues of imperialist colonial policies, while others believe the colonial experience, though painful, brought benefits of modernization.
Taiwan experienced 50 years of colonization at the hands of Japan, while the Hong Kong colonial experience under British rule lasted for more than 150 years. Japan’s rule over Taiwan — especially the later period — successfully established a foundation for the modernization of Taiwan; the effects of which are still felt to this day. Even the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), to a greater or lesser degree, recognizes this fact.
British rule left Hong Kong with a comparatively robust legal system and a financial system well-integrated into the international economy, in addition to a free press and free speech. Compared with today’s China, in these areas Hong Kong is still much more advanced: This is an incontrovertible fact. Indeed, the unequal distribution of power between the colonizer and the colonized is an intrinsic deficiency of colonialism that should not be skirted over.
Taiwan and Hong Kong have shared a remarkably similar fate over recent decades. They — unlike most other former colonies — did not gain independence following relinquishment by their former colonial powers. Instead, they were “returned” — or in the case of Taiwan, “retroceded” — to the “motherland” China, with power simply changing hands. In contrast to other former colonies, in Taiwan and Hong Kong there have been no social movements to reflect upon the history of the colonial period. Instead, the new holders of power have blandly asked their citizens to “love their country.”
This is because the premise for any reflection on the unequal distribution of power under colonialism would undoubtedly be that the people in the post-colonial era are masters of their own destiny. Following several decades of struggle, the Taiwanese are certainly already masters of their own destiny. On the other hand, Hong Kong, whose colonial period lasted far longer than Taiwan’s, is at present still negotiating the thorny, hazardous path to democracy.
Many treatises published by the Hong Kong Federation of Students — organizers of the Umbrella movement — have been based upon critiques of “old” and “new” colonialism; which explains why they have not been accepted by the present governing authorities. How should we contrast and reflect upon the differences between “old” and “new” colonial rule? Living in this so-called “post-colonial” age, this is a task that requires serious attention.
John Lim is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and