It seemed like a simple idea at first: Ask US Republicans what they would do about climate change.
Late last month, some Republicans in the US Senate finally admitted climate change is real. A small minority of 15 Republican senators agreed with the rest of the world that it is caused by human activity.
So what were they going to do about it? The senators did not know, or they were not telling — yet.
Illustration: YUSHA
“You are going to find people very hesitant to talk about this,” an aide to one Republican senator said. The aide was right.
Only three of the 15 Republicans came forward with ideas for climate solutions, when asked by the Guardian.
Those three Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Lamar Alexander — suggested a range of measures from building more nuclear power plants to promoting energy efficiency and encouraging investment in technological research.
Crucially, none of the Republicans proposed a target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions — which cause climate change.
And none of the Republicans backed US President Barack Obama’s plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants.
They argued Obama was going about fighting climate change all wrong.
“My disagreement with the Obama administration is over its wrongheaded approach to solving this problem by proposing to deliberately raise the price of energy and construct a complicated cap-and-trade system,” Alexander said in an e-mailed statement, which also affirmed that human activity was a driver of climate change.
His suggestion was to build 100 new nuclear reactors, to provide emissions-free power and double government-sponsored research.
Murkowski opposed building more reactors without first establishing a permanent repository for nuclear waste, a spokesman said.
He said she supported “responsible efforts” to reduce emissions.
“What Senator Murkowski has said is that we ought to have a no regrets policy that can reduce emissions, but also won’t have a negative impact on the American economy, competitiveness and the weekly budgets of American families,” the spokesman said.
She opposed a carbon tax.
Collins said the answer was in promoting domestic clean energy and efficiency.
“By promoting clean, domestic energy alternatives and efficiency, we can reduce pollution, advance the goal of energy independence for our nation and spur the creation of new manufacturing jobs in America,” the senator said in a statement.
“I’ve always maintained that it is a false choice to pit the environment versus the economy,” she added.
A fourth Republican, Senator John Hoeven, who proposed but eventually voted against one of the climate votes, supported carbon capture technology, a spokesman said.
All the other senators were no-shows, including John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have in the past sponsored bills to put economy-wide limits on carbon pollution through cap-and-trade measures. Both of those attempts ended in defeat.
However, there were signs that the Republican wall of denial about climate change was starting to fall apart, said Senator Brian Schatz, a Democrat who put forward one of the climate change votes in the Senate last month.
Those votes — during the debate over the Keystone XL pipeline — for the first time in years saw Republicans abandoning denial to debate policies of climate change.
“We shouldn’t be Pollyannas about converting anyone from denier to activist, but I think we converted people from denier to non-denier,” Schatz said. “People are going to have to move in increments. You can’t expect people taking a position just about as extreme as you could find would suddenly agree with me on all energy matters.”
“Republicans understand they can’t ignore the problem anymore, and I think they feel on firmer ground if they disagree on policy rather than a set of facts that is well established,” he added.
The votes saw virtually the entire Senate — except for a lone hold-out, Republican Senator Roger Wicker — vote that climate change was real and not a hoax.
Fifteen Republican senators voted with US Democrats that climate change was caused in part by human activity. Five Republican senators voted with Democrats that human activity was the main driver of climate change — which is in line with scientific opinion. Two Republican senators voted with Democrats against a measure seeking to void a US-China deal to cut carbon pollution.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat who also proposed a vote on climate change, said the Republicans were now in disarray on the issue.
“They are all over the place. There is one who says it’s not even happening. There are the others who say the climate is changing, but we have nothing to do with it. There are others who say the climate is changing and we have something to do with it. And then there are others who say the climate is changing and we have a lot to do with it and we should do something about it,” he said.
Whitehouse said Republicans were now caught between, on one side, powerful corporate interests and the conservative Tea Party — which continues to deny the existence of climate change — and on the other, public opinion, which breaks in favor of action on climate change.
A number of the Republicans who broke ranks on climate change are from states Obama won in 2012 and are facing tight re-election contests next year.
“I think the fact that so many felt they needed to vote for the amendments shows that many realize they are being perceived as anti-science and anti-reality, and that is not playing that well back home,” Union of Concerned Scientists director of strategy Alden Meyer said.
Two-thirds of US voters would reject a candidate who denies the existence of human-caused climate change, according to a Stanford University poll released last week.
There could well be other Republicans in Congress who disagree with the party mainstream on climate change — but who are not yet ready to go public, said Jim Brainard, the Republican mayor of Carmel, Indiana, and a longtime supporter of action on climate change.
“I’m sure out of 535 members of Congress there are people in there who agree with me,” he said. “It’s abundantly clear that the climate is changing and we are going to be behind the eight ball on those changes we have to make, and the people who have taken these unrealistic views will not be re-elected.”
The 15 Republican senators who acknowledged the human contribution to climate change included Alexander, Kelly Ayotte, Collins, Bob Corker, Jeff Flake, Graham, Orrin Hatch, Dean Heller, Mark Kirk, McCain, Murkowski, Rand Paul, Rob Portman, Mike Rounds and Pat Toomey.
Five of those senators voted that human activity was a significant cause of climate change. They were: Alexander, Ayotte, Collins, Graham and Kirk.
Ayotte and Collins also voted against the measure seeking to void the US-China climate deal and block Obama from pursuing an international climate change treaty.
The ideas that have come out from the breakaway Republicans so far do not yet add up to a credible alternative to Obama’s vision for fighting climate change.
“They don’t like the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] rules. They don’t like the cap-and-trade bill,” Meyer said. “They got tired of saying: ‘I am not a scientist,’ but it’s not really there yet.”
“It is like AA [Alcoholics Anonymous]. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Those 15 Republicans have now admitted: ‘We have a problem.’ The question is: What are we going to do about it?” he added.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.