It seemed like a simple idea at first: Ask US Republicans what they would do about climate change.
Late last month, some Republicans in the US Senate finally admitted climate change is real. A small minority of 15 Republican senators agreed with the rest of the world that it is caused by human activity.
So what were they going to do about it? The senators did not know, or they were not telling — yet.
Illustration: YUSHA
“You are going to find people very hesitant to talk about this,” an aide to one Republican senator said. The aide was right.
Only three of the 15 Republicans came forward with ideas for climate solutions, when asked by the Guardian.
Those three Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Lamar Alexander — suggested a range of measures from building more nuclear power plants to promoting energy efficiency and encouraging investment in technological research.
Crucially, none of the Republicans proposed a target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions — which cause climate change.
And none of the Republicans backed US President Barack Obama’s plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants.
They argued Obama was going about fighting climate change all wrong.
“My disagreement with the Obama administration is over its wrongheaded approach to solving this problem by proposing to deliberately raise the price of energy and construct a complicated cap-and-trade system,” Alexander said in an e-mailed statement, which also affirmed that human activity was a driver of climate change.
His suggestion was to build 100 new nuclear reactors, to provide emissions-free power and double government-sponsored research.
Murkowski opposed building more reactors without first establishing a permanent repository for nuclear waste, a spokesman said.
He said she supported “responsible efforts” to reduce emissions.
“What Senator Murkowski has said is that we ought to have a no regrets policy that can reduce emissions, but also won’t have a negative impact on the American economy, competitiveness and the weekly budgets of American families,” the spokesman said.
She opposed a carbon tax.
Collins said the answer was in promoting domestic clean energy and efficiency.
“By promoting clean, domestic energy alternatives and efficiency, we can reduce pollution, advance the goal of energy independence for our nation and spur the creation of new manufacturing jobs in America,” the senator said in a statement.
“I’ve always maintained that it is a false choice to pit the environment versus the economy,” she added.
A fourth Republican, Senator John Hoeven, who proposed but eventually voted against one of the climate votes, supported carbon capture technology, a spokesman said.
All the other senators were no-shows, including John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have in the past sponsored bills to put economy-wide limits on carbon pollution through cap-and-trade measures. Both of those attempts ended in defeat.
However, there were signs that the Republican wall of denial about climate change was starting to fall apart, said Senator Brian Schatz, a Democrat who put forward one of the climate change votes in the Senate last month.
Those votes — during the debate over the Keystone XL pipeline — for the first time in years saw Republicans abandoning denial to debate policies of climate change.
“We shouldn’t be Pollyannas about converting anyone from denier to activist, but I think we converted people from denier to non-denier,” Schatz said. “People are going to have to move in increments. You can’t expect people taking a position just about as extreme as you could find would suddenly agree with me on all energy matters.”
“Republicans understand they can’t ignore the problem anymore, and I think they feel on firmer ground if they disagree on policy rather than a set of facts that is well established,” he added.
The votes saw virtually the entire Senate — except for a lone hold-out, Republican Senator Roger Wicker — vote that climate change was real and not a hoax.
Fifteen Republican senators voted with US Democrats that climate change was caused in part by human activity. Five Republican senators voted with Democrats that human activity was the main driver of climate change — which is in line with scientific opinion. Two Republican senators voted with Democrats against a measure seeking to void a US-China deal to cut carbon pollution.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat who also proposed a vote on climate change, said the Republicans were now in disarray on the issue.
“They are all over the place. There is one who says it’s not even happening. There are the others who say the climate is changing, but we have nothing to do with it. There are others who say the climate is changing and we have something to do with it. And then there are others who say the climate is changing and we have a lot to do with it and we should do something about it,” he said.
Whitehouse said Republicans were now caught between, on one side, powerful corporate interests and the conservative Tea Party — which continues to deny the existence of climate change — and on the other, public opinion, which breaks in favor of action on climate change.
A number of the Republicans who broke ranks on climate change are from states Obama won in 2012 and are facing tight re-election contests next year.
“I think the fact that so many felt they needed to vote for the amendments shows that many realize they are being perceived as anti-science and anti-reality, and that is not playing that well back home,” Union of Concerned Scientists director of strategy Alden Meyer said.
Two-thirds of US voters would reject a candidate who denies the existence of human-caused climate change, according to a Stanford University poll released last week.
There could well be other Republicans in Congress who disagree with the party mainstream on climate change — but who are not yet ready to go public, said Jim Brainard, the Republican mayor of Carmel, Indiana, and a longtime supporter of action on climate change.
“I’m sure out of 535 members of Congress there are people in there who agree with me,” he said. “It’s abundantly clear that the climate is changing and we are going to be behind the eight ball on those changes we have to make, and the people who have taken these unrealistic views will not be re-elected.”
The 15 Republican senators who acknowledged the human contribution to climate change included Alexander, Kelly Ayotte, Collins, Bob Corker, Jeff Flake, Graham, Orrin Hatch, Dean Heller, Mark Kirk, McCain, Murkowski, Rand Paul, Rob Portman, Mike Rounds and Pat Toomey.
Five of those senators voted that human activity was a significant cause of climate change. They were: Alexander, Ayotte, Collins, Graham and Kirk.
Ayotte and Collins also voted against the measure seeking to void the US-China climate deal and block Obama from pursuing an international climate change treaty.
The ideas that have come out from the breakaway Republicans so far do not yet add up to a credible alternative to Obama’s vision for fighting climate change.
“They don’t like the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] rules. They don’t like the cap-and-trade bill,” Meyer said. “They got tired of saying: ‘I am not a scientist,’ but it’s not really there yet.”
“It is like AA [Alcoholics Anonymous]. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Those 15 Republicans have now admitted: ‘We have a problem.’ The question is: What are we going to do about it?” he added.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under