Just as illegal structures can be seen everywhere across the nation, the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan is an “illegal structure.”
In urban and rural areas, the percentage of illegal structures is excessive; the situation is out of control. As a result, the government has adopted a buffering method by which it temporarily postpones demolishing old illegal buildings while demolishing new illegal units as soon as they are reported to it.
The day after a fire broke out at an illegal rooftop addition in Taipei’s Nangang District (南港) and killed the tenant in December last year, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) ordered that numbers should be assigned to the city’s illegal rooftop additions and that they should then be demolished in that order. Ko also declared that he would not accept intervention or lobbying by any city councilor in connection with illegal construction cases.
In Greater Taoyuan’s Sinwu District (新屋), a blaze broke out at an illegally built bowling alley last month, killing six young firefighters. Deadly fires like this happen all too frequently. These problems are the result of old ones that have accumulated for years, and they can be seen everywhere in the country.
After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) invaded and occupied Taiwan, where even the state is an illegal structure, the only rule of law was the rule that people’s minds should be politically controlled while the state continued to do as it pleased.
In particular, the rule of the ROC has been restricted to Taiwan since the KMT government occupied it in 1949. In response to losing its legal status as a state, the KMT government consolidated colonial rule in Taiwan through various “provisional articles.” For example, the cancelation of re-elections of representatives of the National Assembly, the Legislative Yuan and the Control Yuan during the long period of Martial Law was just the tip of the iceberg. The situation might have changed, but the KMT government’s attitude has remained the same.
As the government plays with the law, the public also plays with the government. The huge number of illegal structures can be seen as the result of all these provisional articles. Looking at the city from above, illegal rooftop additions and balconies can be seen jutting out of messy and ugly edifices.
The authorities are sitting back and watching as the problem of illegal structures worsens. It has become so widespread, it can no longer be handled by law enforcement. After having seen how the government made a joke of the law during the Martial Law era, the public no longer takes the government or the law seriously.
Furthermore, the “red envelope” culture, which continues unabated, also functions as a protective umbrella. The result is that even some luxury mansions are providing public space in exchange for government incentives. In reality, these owners block the public and keep it for their own private use once construction is completed. One could argue that those luxury mansions also are illegal buildings in a sense.
The ROC in Taiwan is an illegal structure. From a legal perspective, its status is consolidated through distorted administrative power, and the state apparatus remains colonial in nature. To continue occupying Taiwan, the KMT government is willing to call itself “Chinese Taipei,” and it has turned its own anthem and flag into the national anthem and flag. However, as soon as the ROC operates outside of Taiwan in the international community, it has to change its name and appearance. When it deals with China, it merely does so in the name of the KMT. And the ROC? It is going nowhere.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry