The Legislative Yuan concluded its latest session yesterday, and, as usual, the final days saw a flurry of activity to pass amendments and other business so it would appear that lawmakers did something more than hold up big character placards on the legislative floor or host press conferences.
While the session will be remembered more for what it did not accomplish than for what it did, a few votes stand out.
Two that are especially crucial to the nation’s future were the passage of an amendment to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and passage of amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法).
Lowering the threshold for subsidies from 5 percent to 3.5 percent of the votes a party receives for legislator-at-large and overseas legislator posts means smaller political parties might have a better chance of gaining financing, thereby helping to break the chokehold the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and three other major parties have had on the electoral system for far too long.
“Might” is the operative word, given that the Green Party and the New Party would still lose out after the presidential and legislative elections in January next year if they do not improve on their 2012 poll showing of 1.74 percent and 1.49 percent respectively.
However, it is a start at making political life in Taiwan more pluralistic and less susceptible to the massive campaign chests the KMT has been able to finance for decades.
The changes to the Water Pollution Control Act could be even more far-reaching. That such legislation was able to be passed can be traced back to a triple punch delivered in late 2013 that created such a public outcry that lawmakers finally had to take action.
The first blow was delivered in October of that year, when Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE) was found to have been dumping toxic wastewater into the Houjin River (後勁溪) in Greater Kaohsiung.
The second blow came the following month with the release of director Chi Po-lin’s (齊柏林) Beyond Beauty: Taiwan From Above (看見台灣), which documented in stunning color the environmental degradation of the nation’s mountains, coastlines and rivers caused by decades of unchecked development and industrialization, including the illegal dumping of toxic waste and wastewater.
A third blow followed in December 2013, when Lian-yi Industrial Co was found to have been dumping toxic wastewater into the Houjin River. Both ASE and Lian-yi were repeat offenders, but the reprimands and fines they had received for previous incidents appear to have done little to encourage them to change their ways.
Thursday’s amendments boosted the maximum punishments for wastewater discharge that causes illness or disease to seven years in prison plus a fine of NT$20 million (US$636,300), and if the discharges cause severe injuries, the business owners could face up to 10 years in prison — or life in the case of fatalities — and fines of NT$25 million to NT$30 million. Employees or agents found responsible for aiding in the dumping of pollutants will face fines 10 times that of their bosses, or NT$300 million.
While the newly approved amendments did not go as far as reform proponents had argued and fought for, they are major steps forward in changing the “business as usual” approach to both politics and environmental protection in this nation.
For that, legislators have earned a rare thank-you.
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
As the COVID-19 pandemic spins out of control, many parts of the world are experiencing shortages of medical masks and other protective equipment. I am studying in Washington state, which at the time of writing is the US state that has suffered the largest number of deaths from the novel coronavirus. The week before last, UW Medicine — an organization that includes the University of Washington School of Medicine and associated medical centers and clinics — sent its volunteers an e-mail asking the public to make masks and donate them to hospitals. Attached to the message was a mask donation