Global crude oil prices fell to a five-and-a-half-year low on Sunday last week as Brent crude oil futures hit the critical tipping point of US$50 per barrel, sending shockwaves through international stock markets and causing the value of the euro to decline to a nine-year low. The slide in prices continues the downward trend of the past six months, since peaking at US$115 per barrel on June 19 last year, leaving green industries significantly concerned over a potential negative impact on their ability to find financing, as the outlook remains unclear.
Following 36 hours of negotiation at the closing meeting of last month’s annual UN Climate Change Conference, an outline plan seems to have been agreed to tackle the issue of how to make up for a projected 10 billion metric tonne shortfall in the 2020 carbon reduction target, with each signatory nation providing “intended nationally determined contributions.” With the key basis for calculating profit, loss and long-term planning — crude oil prices — having declined significantly, is the world suddenly about to enter a period of drastic climate change from which there can be no recovery?
The continuing slide in oil prices is not due to the discovery of vast new oil fields, but has been caused by in-fighting within international climate politics and a price war between energy producers, triggered by wide-scale development of shale oil and gas in the US. In and among this sits the Russian supply of natural gas to Europe, based on its own strategic considerations, and the self-preservationist policies of Middle Eastern nations as a counter to the US shale revolution.
In addition, there is the longstanding sentimental attachment to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change’s joint protocol on carbon reduction.
The coming storm seems to have caused exporting countries to engage in price-dumping, using cheap supply to bolster demand, which has comprehensively disrupted the price structure of energy markets, and in doing so wiped out the alternative energy market, pulling the rug from under its feet.
The IMF predicts that each time the price of crude oil falls by US$10, the global economy will grow by 0.3 to 0.8 percent. In other words, falling oil prices cause energy prices to slide, which has a positive effect on economic growth. It is estimated that this year global economic growth will reach 4 percent.
The US, as a major energy consumer and emitter of carbon dioxide, is already surging ahead. In the past six months, it has experienced rapid economic recovery, while exporting nations, including Taiwan, are benefiting from the resulting strong increase in demand. Prosperity has returned and unemployment is down. It appears that, with the rocketing ahead of the “bellwether” US economy leading to a huge increase in consumption of oil, coal and other carbon-containing energy sources, each nation’s pledge to reduce carbon emissions will be broken.
Since 2008, Taiwan’s energy resource intensity has fallen year-on-year, with an average yearly improvement of approximately 2.5 percent. According to this trend, before 2020, Taiwan will be able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 2005 levels, thereby achieving President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) declared carbon reduction goal.
Considering that the nation imports approximately 300 million barrels of crude oil per year and international oil prices have been cut in half, Taiwan can save approximately US$1.5 billion in oil purchase costs. This would contribute 2 percent toward GDP and has been described by central bank governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) as a “tax cut.”
For an energy-hungry, exporting nation such as Taiwan, this provides a welcome boost to the economy, which is this year expected to grow by about 4 percent. In addition, the price of gasoline at pumps has already been cut an unprecedented 17 consecutive times over the past six months, and 95 octane unleaded gasoline is about to fall to NT$25 a liter. The public has sensed this, which will undoubtedly lead to an increase in the consumption of all types of energy. If exports flourish, and the government and private sector join forces in an all-out economic push, this year’s carbon emissions will certainly increase sharply.
Whether it is frequent extreme global weather events, havoc caused by heatwaves and cold snaps, or droughts and floods, humanity, as the Western saying goes, will be “courting disaster.” However, hesitation and caution are not permitted during the making of easy profits. Thus, the invisible hand — prices — which stimulate markets, industries and individuals, as if through the waving of a magic wand, throws up a misty fog of glimmering profits, distracting people’s gazes from the ultimate fate of humanity. The grand plan of global carbon reduction now seems to be a lost cause, with global warming the only possible outcome.
Wei Kuo-yen is minister of the Environmental Protection Administration.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry