Taiwanese have long been concerned about China’s infringement of its space on the international stage. Now they have to be worried about its increasing infringement on the nation’s air space.
In yet another slap in the face to Taipei, Beijing this week said that as of the beginning of March, it would add four new air routes to reduce congestion between Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta. The crucial north-south route, labeled M503, would run nearly parallel to the median line of the Taiwan Strait and come as close as 7.8km to it.
That Beijing made the announcement without consulting Taiwanese authorities in advance was yet another sign that it pays only lip service to the idea of cross-strait negotiations and dealing with Taipei as an equal. The comment by a spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office that the nation should show “more understanding and less suspicion” was a prime example of Chinese superciliousness.
Taiwanese authorities say the proposed routes would conflict with existing ones. While the new routes would fall under the jurisdiction of the Shanghai Flight Information Region (FIR), the nearness of M503 to the Taipei FIR means that Taiwanese air traffic controllers would have to worry about it, especially during bad weather.
The Taipei FIR, which covers 180,000 square nautical miles (about 617,383km2), is responsible for some of the busiest airspace in the region. It is bordered by Japan’s Fukuoka FIR, the Hong Kong FIR, the Shanghai FIR and the Manila FIR, and its western boundary runs close to the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
In 2013, it was estimated that about 1.3 million flights carrying 40 million travelers pass through the Taipei FIR annually. Air traffic, both passenger and cargo, has only grown since then.
Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂) said the government has protested to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) over the new routes and urged Beijing to negotiate on the issue with Taipei. However, Beijing said it had already cleared the four routes with the ICAO — although one Chinese official added that it was willing to “communicate” with Taipei over the matter.
This incident is another reminder of the nation’s impotence because of its exclusion from membership in UN-related organizations and agencies since the Republic of China lost its UN seat in 1971.
The government hailed its ability to send representatives to the ICAO assembly in October 2013 for the first time in decades as a breakthrough resulting from its efforts to ease cross-strait tensions, but the truth is that they were only there as “guests” of the ICAO council president because China had blocked efforts by the US and several other nations for Taiwan to gain even observer status in the organization.
It is hard not to see this week’s actions as a follow-up to the November 2013 declaration of an air defense identification zone over a large portion of the East China Sea. Beijing has once again shown that it is not willing to be, or interested in being, a team player or a responsible actor on either a regional or global stage. It just keeps nibbling away, pushing the boundaries and hoping that others will be too intimidated to push back.
The Chinese move to unilaterally establish air routes is not something that Beijing can claim to be “a purely domestic affair.” Aviation traffic safety is an international concern and relies upon smoothly integrated teamwork by air traffic controllers from neighboring nations, who must respect and trust each other’s decisions.
There has been a lot of press in China recently about the bad behavior of Chinese air passengers as well as tourists abroad, with the government considering publishing a national blacklist to shame travelers into behaving in a “more civilized” manner to earn international respect. It is clearly a lesson that has yet to be learned at the top in Beijing as well.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations