Amid the horrors of last week’s terror attacks in Paris, French President Francois Hollande is widely judged to have kept his calm, acted decisively and spoken the words of condemnation, defiance and unity expected in a crisis of a French president, who by tradition is called on to embody the nation.
In the days after the attacks, Hollande, long seen by much of his electorate as weak and indecisive, has had a great boost in political terms. As he gathered around him dozens of world leaders on Sunday for a vast rally in support of liberty, solidarity and tolerance, he seemed for the moment to rise to their stature.
However, no one expects this mood of solidarity to last very long; indeed, the attacks have already sharpened his clash with the far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen. Hollande remains the most unpopular French president since World War II. He is troubled by a weak economy, high unemployment and an underlying atmosphere of anxiety and even fear, among both Muslims and Jews, about the impact of homegrown Islamic radicalism.
Illustration: Mountain People
In coming weeks, he and his government are certain to confront painful questions about intelligence and security lapses and whether the carnage of last week could have been averted.
“Hollande has been extremely good in this crisis, showing calm and self-control, and using all the right words,” Le Monde editorial writer Alain Frachon said. “If we do a cold, cynical political analysis, he did rather well. Afterward, of course, all these questions will be raised about security failures and the future.”
If Hollande has gotten a small boost from these terrible few days, so too has Le Pen and her party, which has made the challenge of radical Islam to France the center of its politics. Even before the attacks, Le Pen’s brand of nationalistic French populism had helped make her a credible contender to succeed Hollande in the 2017 election.
The homegrown terrorism in France, with its apparent links to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group, will also be used by other far-right, nationalist and anti-immigration movements in Europe, from the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain to the Sweden Democrats and Germany’s Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West (PEGIDA). That is another reason so many European leaders from the mainstream parties of the center-right and center-left, from German Chancellor Angela Merkel to British Prime Minister David Cameron and Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, came to show their own solidarity with France and Hollande.
Invitees also included the leaders of all the main French political parties, including former leaders, such as former French president Nicolas Sarkozy and his rivals on the center-right in the Union for a Popular Movement, former French prime ministers Alain Juppe and Francois Fillon, who themselves are divided, but also battling for voters attracted to National Front.
However, Le Pen was excluded from the rally in what many consider a political mistake by Hollande’s Socialist Party, which organized the event.
Le Pen, whose support in various opinion polls for the 2017 presidential election comes close to 30 percent, loudly charged foul. Her exclusion made a mockery of the concept of national unity, she said, adding that was itself a violation of “freedom of expression,” which the rally was meant to uphold. She accused the political elite of “astounding cowardice” to isolate “the only political movement that has no responsibility in the current situation, nor do its millions of voters.”
“The masks fall,” she said. “National unity is a pitiful political maneuver.”
She said her supporters would see her exclusion as a “tribute” to their power, adding: “They will have the opportunity if they wish to express their opinion at the ballot box.”
Le Pen’s embrace of exclusion perfectly fits her politics. Using old tropes of the far-right in France, she took pride in avoiding Paris, which she and her supporters view as the center of political corruption and cynicism, for la France profonde, the “real France” of genuine patriots tied to their land and their provinces. On Sunday, she marched instead in southern France, in Beaucaire, where her party won local elections.
“We’ll march there where the spirit of tolerance is the strongest, where sectarianism is less violent,” she said.
Le Figaro journalist Alain Barluet said Hollande had handled the situation well except for his exclusion of Le Pen.
“The problem for us now is simple: Will she be the next president?” Barluet said. “Many people are unhappy with the exclusion of the National Front from the march, since she is always emphasizing this fracture — that she is a victim, that she is the real France.”
Hollande will benefit for a time from national mourning and solidarity, Barluet said.
“We’ll have to see how long this very fragile unity will last,” he added. “You’ll see, next week things will again begin to crumble.”
At the rally, near the Bastille, Nicolas Michaud, 31, said he attended to defend “French values, freedom of speech and liberty — France is not a race or a religion.”
Hollande and the police did well, and “he assumed his role as president,” Michaud said. Today is for unity, he added.
“It’s a turning point, but divisions will resurface.” As for Le Pen, “Her bread and butter is division,” he said.
Valerie Berjolet, 50, who attended with her family, said that every politician would try to capitalize on the event. Le Pen “always profits by playing the role of martyr,” she said. “The others gave her the opportunity so she could act like this.”
With the Union for a Popular Movement so divided, “It’s very difficult not to see Le Pen doing better,” said Pierre Rousselin, a political analyst and author of The Democracies in Danger.
Faced with a challenge from Sarkozy and the center-right, Hollande is trying to establish himself as the only viable alternative to Le Pen, he said.
“If Hollande can do that, it will be good for him,” Rousselin said. “This is cynical politics, and there’s a lot of this going on beneath the spirit and the beautiful slogan that ‘we are all Charlie.’”
Rousselin said the problem is that “the National Front is the only party that is saying out loud things that many people feel, and the current moment is playing into this discourse. If you had national unity with the National Front present, you could say that we are united and the terrorists are isolated, but the problem is the infighting that starts the day after.”
At the rally, Nasser Khassani, 39, traveled from the suburbs to wear a placard on his chest reading: “I am a Christian, I am a Jew, I am a Muslim.” He came out of “empathy for the victims,” and to “thank the police and the government — not the Socialist Party, but the Republic,” he said.
However, Claude Dugenet, 60, was less appreciative.
“This national unity will not last, for sure,” he said. The crisis was handled well once it happened, but it was “deplorable” not to have acted sooner, he said. “Today we are suffering the consequences.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this