Tue, Jan 13, 2015 - Page 9 News List

British and Dutch researchers develop new lie-detector test

The new method, which measures full-body responses to achieve an accuracy rate of more than 70%, could be in use in by police globally within a decade

By Ewen MacAskill  /  The Guardian

Police and intelligence agencies around the world have for almost 100 years relied on lie-detectors to help convict criminals or unearth spies and traitors.

The invention is beloved of the movies, with countless dramatic moments showing the guilty sweating profusely as they are hooked up.

However, the polygraph could soon be defunct. Researchers in the UK and the Netherlands have made a breakthrough, developing a new method with a success rate of more than 70 percent in tests that could be in use in police stations around the world within a decade.

Rather than relying on a few facial tics, talking too much or waving of arms — all seen as telltale signs of lying when being interviewed — the new method involves monitoring full-body motions to provide an indicator of guilty feelings.

The polygraph is widely used in the US in criminal and other cases and for security clearance for the FBI and CIA, but it is less popular in Europe. There has been a lot of skepticism in the scientific and legal communities about its reliability, but the new method developed by the researchers has performed well in experiments.

The basic premise is that liars fidget more and that the use of an all-body motion suit, the kind used in movies for helping create cartoons, would pick this up.

The full-body suit contains 17 sensors that register movement up to 120 times per second in three dimensions for 23 joints.

The findings were due to be published at an international conference on system sciences opening at Kauai, Hawaii, on Monday last week.

One of the academics, Cambridge University professor of security engineering Ross Anderson, said: “Decades of deception research show that the interviewer will tell truth from lies only slightly better than random, about 55 out of 100. The polygraph has been around since the 1920s and by measuring physiological stress induced by anxiety you can get to 60.”

“However, it can easily be abused as an interrogation prop and many people are anxious anyway facing a polygraph on which their job or liberty depends,” he added.

He said the new method, by contrast, achieved a reliability rating of over 70 percent and he was confident they would be able to do better. In some tests, they have already achieved more than 80 percent.

“The takeaway message is that guilty people fidget more and we can measure this robustly,” he said.

Anderson added the research had a special significance now, against the background of the US Senate report on torture by the CIA.

“We have known for a long time that torture does not work,” he said.

Apart from the moral case against torture, the new method offers an alternative pragmatic method of conducting interviews.

The research paper was written by Cambridge University’s Sophie van der Zee, Utrecht University’s Ronald Poppe, Lancaster University’s Paul Taylor and Anderson.

The polygraph, created in 1921 by a student in California and a policeman, records changes in pulse, sweating and breathing. Despite movies suggesting that the device is near-infallible, the US Supreme Court in 1998 ruled there was no consensus that the polygraph is reliable, a finding supported by the National Academy of Scientists in 2003.

However, it is still widely used in the US in criminal cases and for job security clearance. It is much less popular in Europe.

This story has been viewed 3229 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top