Ma’s pretense over China
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently said Taiwan has not become overly reliant on China, since its ratio of exports to China allegedly “dropped” to 39 percent (“Ma denies over-reliance on China trade,” Jan. 1, page 3). At the same time, Ma argued that it was only natural for Taiwan to have a close trade relationship with China, alluding to Taiwan’s geographical proximity to China and referencing the reliance on trade by Mexico and Canada with their huge neighbor, the US.
Is Ma being naive, duplicitous or merely obtuse? The US has not announced that either Mexico or Canada were part of the US, nor that the US intends to annex them. The US has not aimed thousands of missiles at its neighbors, nor has it regularly suppressed its neighbors’ respective presence in international affairs, even to the point of objecting to either of them raising their flags anywhere on Earth or using their own names.
Is Ma being naive, duplicitous or merely obtuse? It is not the geographical proximity of Taiwan and China that concerns Taiwanese, but rather the Chinese National Party’s (KMT) political and ideological proximity to the Chinese Communist Party dictatorship that concerns them.
In the case of the US and its neighbors, neither Mexico nor Canada deem the US a threat to them, but rather an opportunity. The same cannot be said of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Taiwan is under daily assault from China in many ways — economically, politically, socially, militarily, technologically. China is Taiwan’s single most significant existential threat. Most Taiwanese know this well.
Is Ma being naive, duplicitous or merely obtuse? China is not the US, and Taiwan is neither Mexico nor Canada. The facts speak for themselves. Taiwanese must be vigilant and vocal from now until next year to prevent Ma from steering the nation even deeper into China’s economic orbit, a situation that would become ever more desperate (for Ma, the KMT and for China) as the president nears the end of his eight-year “unification” mission.
Los Angeles, California
Taiwan’s sovereignty issue
The Republic of China (ROC) national flag was raised almost every year in every US city in which a Taipei Economic and Cultural Office (TECO) is located, such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, Chicago and more. Every TECO delivered the the same message to overseas Chinese year after year since World War II — that they work on behalf of the nation of the ROC, the free China established by ROC founding father Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙). The issue is that their message has been out of date since 1978.
On Jan. 1, after the flag-raising at Twin Oaks Estate in Washington, Representative to the US Shen Lyu-shun (沈呂巡) said his office had notified the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) about the event beforehand and received approval from US President Barack Obama’s administration. He said with pride that: “We not only returned, but we did it with dignity, respect and honor.”
Shen’s remark was endorsed by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
However, on Tuesday last week, after Shen returned to Taipei and told media outlets his office had not informed the AIT in advance about the flag-raising, but it had been his intention to do so, and that he had informed the US government afterward and they understood.
Well, it is not true. A senior official in Obama’s administration strongly denied the approval or knowing in advance of the flag-raising. US Department of State spokesperson Jan Psaki condemned the flag-raising twice within a week, saying it was inconsistent with the spirit of US policy.
AIT spokesperson Mark Zimmer gave a terse and clear statement: (1) We reiterate that [the US] did not approve or know about the Jan. 1 flag-raising in advance. (2) We are disappointed with this action, and we have raised our serious concerns with senior Taiwan authorities in Taipei and Washington. (3) It is our hope that Taiwan will demonstrate the priority it puts on the US-Taiwan relationship by ensuring that these kinds of things do not happen again.
In Taiwan most legislators and the majority of the public endorsed raising the flag. The prevalent attitude was that Twin Oaks Estate is Taiwan’s sovereign property, so why should the flag not be raised on national property? To this question, Psaki gave a clear answer: “The Twin Oaks Estate is a representative compound; it’s not a private home.”
What a shame that Shen, as a diplomat, does not know that his job is to maintain the relationship between Taiwan and the US, and not to say that we have returned with dignity, respect and honor.
The ROC flag does not represent Taiwan. It cannot be seen at any international occasion, such as the Olympic Games. Because it represents the exiled government of the ROC it does not represent Taiwan. Shen should study the three communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act. Taiwan is not the ROC and the ROC is not Taiwan.
So, what flag should be allowed to fly over Twin Oaks Estate and officially in Taiwan? It relates to the “status quo” of Taiwan today. Is it an independent country with sovereignty?
Popular sovereignty — electing governmental officials or even presidents — does not equate to territorial sovereignty. Territorial sovereignty is transferred from government to government. The last sovereign ruler of Taiwan was Japan. Who is the sovereign ruler of the nation today?
How to transfer it to Taiwan? That is a serious project for all Taiwanese this year.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the