A couple of years ago, a Canadian minister proudly declared that Santa Claus was a citizen of Canada. After all, his home and toy factory are at the North Pole, which, according to the minister’s interpretation, belongs to Canada.
Though Santa Claus has not commented on the matter, it is now clear that he could choose several passports when he travels the world every Dec. 24th. In 2007, a privately funded mini-submarine planted a Russian flag directly beneath his alleged home and two weeks ago, Denmark, which has sovereignty over Greenland, staked its own territorial claim also covering the North Pole.
By filing its claim with the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Denmark has joined our era’s “Great Game”: The contest for economic control over a large part of the Arctic. Denmark’s claim is massive; not only does it seek sovereignty over everything between Greenland and the North Pole, it is extending its claim to nearly 900,000km2 of territory, all the way to the existing limits of Russia’s economic zone on the other side of the Pole — an area 20 times Denmark’s size.
How to assess countries’ claims to Arctic territory hinges on the status of the Lomonosov Ridge, a vast formation that rises from the sea floor and stretches 1,800km from Greenland to the East Siberian continental shelf. Everyone agrees that it is a ridge. The key question is whether it is an extension of the Greenland shelf or an extension of the East Siberia shelf.
Together with the government of Greenland, Copenhagen now claims that the ridge belongs to the Greenland shelf, giving it the right to extend its economic zone across a huge area at the top of the world. Although nothing is yet known about the claim Moscow says it will present in the spring, there is no doubt that it will argue the opposite.
So what about Canada and its claim? That remains to be seen, but there have been reports that Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is dissatisfied that Canadian scientists are not being sufficiently aggressive in pressing the country’s case.
Nonetheless, for all the hype about a “race for the Arctic,” and despite the rather icy atmosphere among the claimants, there is little reason to fear conflict. Under the terms of the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration, all of the countries bordering the Arctic Ocean agree to resolve their claims peacefully and based on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. According to settled procedure, a UN commission will first judge whether the claims have merit. If they are overlapping, which is highly probable, bilateral negotiations will be held.
Such talks could take time, to put it mildly. Norway and Russia negotiated over a far smaller territorial delimitation for four decades.
Both Denmark and Russia have been devoting significant resources to exploring the Lomonosov Ridge. Denmark has hired Swedish icebreakers for repeated expeditions and Russia has been deploying special submarines to obtain samples from the ridge and the ocean floor.
The Arctic region has always been strategically vital for Russia, accounting for about 85 percent of Russia’s natural gas production, which is based primarily in Western Siberia. The Kremlin has activated a new military command for the Arctic and is busy reopening air bases and radar stations along its Arctic shoreline.
Yet it is a very long way from these new Russian bases to virtually everywhere and, in addition to the vast distances, there is the harsh climate. Asked what he would do if foreign soldiers attacked his country’s Far North, a Canadian military commander calmly replied that he would dispatch an expedition to rescue them. Although Moscow had hoped for a rapid increase in shipping along the Northern Sea Route, commercial traffic this year fell by 77 percent.
Of course, the stakes are too high for Canada, Denmark and Russia to allow the region’s remoteness and hostile environment influence how resolutely they press their claims. Boundaries like these are fixed once and forever, and no one knows what discoveries, technologies and opportunities the future might bring.
Yet for the time being, neither Santa Claus, nor anyone else, has reason to be worried. The nature of the Lomonosov Ridge will be debated for years to come, while his thoughts — and ours — are likely to be focused on more immediate issues.
Carl Bildt is a former prime minister and foreign minister of Sweden.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs