The election for Chang Hwa Bank’s board of directors on Dec. 8 was a big victory for the Ministry of Finance, which managed to secure a majority on the board. However, the ministry is now being sued by the bank’s main private shareholder, Taishin Financial Holding Co, which has also lodged a complaint with the Control Yuan over the matter. This outcome came as a shock to foreign investors such as the Soros Asian Fund.
The most controversial aspect is that the ministry, holding just 18 percent of the bank’s shares, could score a major win against Taishin, which has a 22.5 percent stake. The ministry achieved this by persuading small shareholders to sign instruments of proxy allowing it to use their votes, thus enabling it to gain control over the private corporation. This incident is being described as an astonishing phenomenon in Taiwan’s capital markets, while others say it is the first time such a thing has happened in a democracy.
When Taishin Financial Holding acquired a controlling stake in Chang Hwa Bank in 2005, the ministry pledged to help it secure a majority on the board. However, at the Dec. 8 shareholders’ meeting Taishin found itself up against Joanne Ling (凌忠嫄), director-general of the National Treasury Administration, which is subordinate to the ministry. Ling took personal command of the operation at the meeting. Feeling tricked and robbed, Taishin sued the ministry for breach of trust.
The ministry’s unprecedented actions have sparked accusations that it broke its promise to Taishin and the incident is a big step backward in the privatization process. It is worth considering why government departments still play such a strong guiding role in economic activity even after Taiwan has been promoting liberalization for decades.
This kind of thing does not just happen with banks. It is even more true of financial markets that the government always calls the shots. In securities markets, the government can wield its “four big funds” — the Postal Savings Fund, the Labor Insurance Fund, the Labor Pension Fund and the Civil Servants Pension Fund — and intervene through state-run financial institutions. If necessary, the National Stabilization Fund can also intervene in the market.
State intervention is even more blatant in the foreign exchange markets, where fluctuations in the value of the New Taiwan dollar are controlled almost entirely by the central bank with its huge foreign currency reserves.
What harm is there in having a government that takes charge of everything? Taking the foreign currency market as an example, former deputy central bank governor Shea Jia-dong (許嘉棟) summed it up when he criticized the monetary authority for always trying to stop the NT dollar from appreciating, but not from depreciating. He said the central bank releases NT dollar reserves by buying foreign currencies, but does not sterilize its intervention. This has led to high capital liquidity and kept interest rates low for a long time, which in turn encourages the price of real estate and other assets to rise.
This policy has a very tangible effect on ordinary people. They feel it when they change money to go abroad and when they buy imported goods, including everyday necessities such as flour and gasoline. Given this, people often ask why it is necessary to use currency rates to subsidize manufacturers and exporters, when they are the ones who always want the NT dollar to lose value.
The same is true of the energy market, in which state-run electricity supplier Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) has a near-monopoly. It over-invests in big power stations and has major problems with operational efficiency. This obstructs the development of renewable energy resources and dims the prospects of a nuclear-free homeland.
Taipower’s monopolistic control of the nation’s electricity transmission and distribution system allows it to set the price of electricity. It was Taipower’s price hikes that kicked off a wave of increases in the prices of retail goods two years ago. Now, Taipower has been found to be making excessive profits and, although it has been forced to make some concessions to consumers, it is still trying to muddy the waters by adopting a new formula for electricity prices.
CPC Corp, Taiwan, which is in an oligopolistic position, is another example. Although the market price of petroleum does fluctuate, CPC, like Taipower, has been accused of taking advantage of consumers through sleight of hand in its price-setting formulas.
After last month’s nine-in-one elections, a wave of calls for reform has arisen. However, where the economy is concerned, the peculiar phenomenon of the government calling all the shots is going from bad to worse. Surely, this is not an issue the public can ignore.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry