In May 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was voted into office under a banner that trumpeted him as a clean-cut politician with high moral standards. Lambasting his predecessor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), as corrupt, Ma pledged to spare no effort in stamping out graft and stressed clean government as one of his core principles.
However, six years into his presidency, the very virtues Ma claimed to pride himself on are being severely questioned, with continuous rumors alleging that he received off-the-book political donations from scandal-ridden Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際).
First came the claim from political commentator Wu Tsu-chia (吳子嘉), who prior to the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections accused Ma of having received NT$1 billion (US$31.45 million) from the Wei (魏) family, who own Ting Hsin International, during his presidential re-election campaign in 2012. This was followed by an allegation from media personality Clara Chou (周玉蔻) this week that “Ma’s team” received NT$200 million under the table from the food conglomerate. Chou stepped up her accusation on Tuesday by naming Ma as having personally received the money.
Adding to these simmering allegations was Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元), who last week claimed that the top echelons of the party had asked KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) to refrain from bashing Ting Hsin during his campaign. Furthermore, KMT Legislator Hsieh Kuo-liang (謝國樑) said after the election that Ma could not act freely during the cooking oil scandals involving Ting Hsin because of the donations it had made.
Other than venting hot air through press releases denying Wu and Chou’s allegations, and accusing Chou of smearing his name, Ma so far has not taken strong actions to defend himself.
This lack of action is baffling considering the lengths Ma went to during the “September strife” last year to try to win his showdown with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) over the latter’s alleged influence peddling. Ma at the time not only took to the podium several times to address the issue, he took legal action against Wang, adamant in his bid to strip Wang of his KMT membership for what he termed “tarnishing the party’s image and reputation.”
If Ma went to such lengths to uphold “the party’s image and reputation,” many wonder why he has not taken similarly strong actions against Chou to defend his own image and reputation?
While some have called Chou’s claims into question on the grounds that she has not backed them with evidence, Ma’s inaction in defending his name is not helping — it is instead brewing doubt among the public, all the while spurring skeptical minds who are willing to give Chou the benefit of the doubt, despite her lack of proof.
As Chou said, the crux of the alleged donation lies not in the money itself, but in the “special relations” purportedly established with its receipt, which she claims made Ma the guardian angel, or men shen (門神), of the Wei family.
Amid the snowballing allegations involving his integrity, Ma, as the head of state, should — for the sake of national stability — do something quick to show to the public that he possesses genuine determination to defend his name and put the whole issue to rest.
Ma could come forward and clarify the matter once and for all by calling a news conference, as he did when he was tussling with Wang last year. Or better yet, to truly eliminate any doubts, Ma could, of his own initiative, request that the Special Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office investigate Chou’s claims.
Silence is not golden when it comes to defamation, which is what Ma’s press releases claim that Chou is doing with her allegations. If Ma continues to respond passively, he will only raise further suspicion among the public.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.