Two recent visits by Chinese officials have provided ample proof of the lengths to which Beijing will take its carrot and stick approach to cross-strait ties — both of which appear equally indigestible.
First came China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Deming (陳德銘), with his barely veiled warnings that Beijing wanted to see the cross-strait service trade agreement inked in June last year implemented as soon as possible and progress made on other deals under negotiation, or else who knows what could happen once China’s all but signed free-trade pact with South Korea takes effect.
Next came former Chinese deputy minister of health Huang Jiefu (黃潔夫), with his offer on Friday last week to help “facilitate” the establishment of a cross-strait supply line of organs for transplants — after, of course, the pesky moral issue of China using organs harvested from executed prisoners is resolved by changing the law to bar their use. The dubiousness of the offer was enhanced by Huang’s reminder that in China’s eyes, Taiwan is just another “domestic territory,” so that it would be “quite normal for citizens to donate their organs to one another.”
Yes, there is a great need for organ donations in Taiwan, with more than 8,500 people on waiting lists — the vast majority needing a new kidney — and only about 200 donors annually. And yes, there are an ever-increasing number of people from Taiwan traveling to China to undergo organ transplants. However, despite comments from some people who should know better that the offer from Huang — who heads China’s organ donation committee — was “a good thing” and reflective of Beijing’s “benign intentions,” the idea is anything but benign and should be vigorously rejected.
To begin with, Huang made an offer that neither he nor China is in any position to meet now or in the foreseeable future.
Huang on Dec. 4 said that starting on Jan. 1, only organs voluntarily donated by civilians — ie, not executed prisoners — will be able to be used for transplants in China. However, he made the same promise in 2012 and in November last year said that the sourcing of organs from executions would be stopped by the end of that year.
The problem is that, according to Chinese state media reports, organs from executed prisoners have in the past accounted for anywhere between two-thirds and nine-tenths of transplants conducted in China, and there is no reliable source to make up that deficit once such a ban takes effect.
According to the BBC, Huang on Dec. 4 said that China’s donation rate is 0.6 per million population (pmp). Compare that to Spain, which last year topped the International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation chart for organs harvested from deceased donors at 35.1ppm, with Croatia right behind at 35ppm, while Turkey tops the chart for living organ donors at 46.6ppm, followed by South Korea at 36.6ppm. It is clear that China has a long way to go to meet its own needs, even without Huang adding that about 300,000 people are awaiting organ transplants in China, but just 10,000 operations are conducted every year.
Huang may think it is normal for citizens to donate their organs to one another, but he has been able to make little headway among his compatriots since helping to establish China’s national organ donation network in 2009. This is partly due to cultural norms, but China’s thriving black market in body parts also serves to deter would-be donors, even though Beijing outlawed organ trafficking in 2007 and declared it a crime in 2008. Surveys have found that some Chinese fear becoming organ donors because of the continuing illicit trade.
Huang’s offer is as much pie-in-the-sky as Beijing’s promises of endless benefits to Taiwan in the post-Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) era, and look were those have gotten Taiwan. He should make sure his own house is in order before trying to build a bridge out of body parts to Taiwan.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry