In the aftermath of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) rout in the recent nine-in-one elections, a report on the defeat has identified some of the reasons for the outcome.
New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) — who many in the party see as needing to as shoulder the burden of party reform — in a Facebook post concerning the party’s future completely failed to mention the public’s dissatisfaction with the erosion of Taiwan’s sovereignty under the government of the KMT’s former chairman, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), nor did he speak of the difficulty Taiwan is having in becoming a normalized country.
With the so-called “1992 consensus” of “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what that means” that the Ma administration has followed, Taiwan has belittled itself in its dealings with China — “cross-strait relations” — and the office of president has come to represent a mere regional head. The diplomatic truce between Taipei and Beijing has cost Taiwan the international status and respect it is due.
The KMT needs to start over. It should ditch the “one China” principle and “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what that means,” and reinvent itself as a new KMT, with Taiwan at the center, as its starting point.
Previous opinion polls tell us that the majority of Taiwanese identify themselves predominantly as Taiwanese — as opposed to Chinese — and until the KMT drops the “Chinese” from its title, how can it win even the most basic trust of the populace? The question is, what plans does a KMT with the word “Chinese” in its title have for Taiwan? Is it looking for eventual unification with China? Will it accept Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula? Or will it continue to suffocate Taiwan within the “one China” framework and consign Taiwan to forever roam the margins of the international community?
The KMT is fully aware of how sensitive that initial word in the full title of the party is, and that is why they prefer to avoid using it in many fora, and refer to themselves using the abbreviated version of that name. Whenever there is an election, they are careful to shout slogans using the word Taiwan. Most party members, with the exception of those in the older generation, were born and raised in Taiwan, or have settled down and made a life for themselves here, and Taiwan has always done well by them. Why not leave the old KMT to people like former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) or former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村)?
It would not be too painful for the KMT to change its name. The communist parties in countries within the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe changed their names after the collapse of communism to accept their new realities, and some of them have even done well at the ballot box and gone on to govern.
Why would the younger generation, who identify themselves with Taiwan and are passionate about their country and who advocate placing Taiwan first, want to join a political party that places China at its heart and “Chinese” in its title?
The KMT will only win Taiwanese hearts if it transforms itself into a party that lives and breathes Taiwan. A new, reinvented KMT will only dispel the doubts of the Taiwanese if it normalizes relations with Beijing. Given sufficient time, the younger generation in China will also come to see relations between China and Taiwan in a more natural conventional way, and the way unscrupulous Taiwanese businesspeople and their compradors view the KMT is evolving. If the KMT wants to reinvent itself, it needs to start by changing its name.
Chen Wen-hsien is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of History.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry