A Liberian-flagged container ship presently making its way down the Suez Canal is at the center of a controversy over Taiwan-China links and national sovereignty.
The ship, Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp’s YM Cypress is at the center of two court cases, one in Greater Kaohsiung and one in Guangzhou, China, that are proceeding at a much more glacial pace than the vessel itself.
A Taiwanese insurance firm filing a motion in a foreign court as part of efforts to win compensation for an accident claim would not normally be a big deal — except that the claim was filed in a maritime court in Guangzhou, the insurance company’s client is the Coast Guard Administration (CGA), the defendant is a Taiwanese firm and the accident occurred in a shipping lane off the coast of Greater Tainan.
Taiwan Fire & Marine Insurance Co’s decision to seek recourse in a Chinese court for damage done to the CG 126 Tainan by the Cypress in a May 2011 collision appears to put business interests ahead of common sense and national interest, even if the company was just asking the court to seize the assets of the Cypress, which was docked in Guangzhou at the time.
That the Coast Guard Administration would countenance the move beggars belief.
A coast guard spokesman said that the insurers were legally entitled to protect their business interests and there was nothing wrong with that. He said that providing the Guangzhou court with 126 Tainan’s nautical charts, logbook and other data would not affect national security.
However, there is plenty wrong with asking a Chinese court to rule on an incident that took place in the Republic of China’s (ROC) waters, even if you do accept the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) fantasy that the ROC still encompasses the area of the People’s Republic of China.
Perhaps national security would not be threatened, but the ROC’s national sovereignty certainly is by seeking relief from the judicial system of a country that is the biggest threat to the nation’s existence.
The case does not fall under the Agreement on Joint Cross-Strait Crime-Fighting and Mutual Judicial Assistance signed in April 2009. It also does not fall under the remit of the Criminal Code, which treats crimes committed in China as if they occurred in Taiwan because of the way the Constitution is worded.
The coast guard’s reaction provides more fuel to critics of the nation’s armed forces, who have been upset in recent years by the penchant for retired military brass and national security officials to seek common ground with their counterparts in China. A trip in May to Guangdong Province by more than 20 retired generals to meet with People’s Liberation Army retirees and Chinese government officials is one such incident; the May 2010 trip by retired flag officers to Nanjing for the “Cross-Strait Retired Generals Golf Invitational” was another.
The concern is not just what these former military leaders and intelligence officers might say while being wined and dined by their former enemies — tidbits about contingency planning, command-and-control relationships and insights about senior officials — but the impression they make on those currently serving in the armed forces, policymakers and society as a whole.
The actions and comments of such retirees can be read as either a shocking level of Mainlander naivete or callous contempt for Taiwan and the Taiwanese who paid their salaries for decades and now fund their retirements.
However, the disingenuousness of the Coast Guard Administration in dismissing the Chinese court suit as simply a matter of business that is out of its hands is not just worrisome, it is sickening and should be condemned in the strongest terms.
There is nothing business-as-usual about involving Chinese courts in purely Taiwanese affairs.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry