The police killing unarmed civilians. Horrifying income inequality. Rotting infrastructure and an unsafe “safety net.” An inability to respond to climate, public health and environmental threats. A food system that causes disease. An occasionally dysfunctional and even cruel government. A sizable segment of the population excluded from work and subject to near-random incarceration.
You get it: This is the US, which, with the incoming US Congress, might actually get worse.
This in part explains why people are seeing spontaneous protests nationwide — protests that, in their scale, racial diversity, anger and largely nonviolent nature, are unusual if not unique.
I was in four cities recently — New York, Washington, Berkeley and Oakland — and there were actions every night in each of them.
Meanwhile, workers walked off the job in 190 cities on Dec. 4.
The root of the anger is inequality, about which statistics are mind-boggling: From 2009 to 2012 — that is the most recent data — about 95 percent of new income went to the top 1 percent; the Walton family (owners of Wal-Mart stores) has as much wealth as the bottom 42 percent of the nation’s people combined; and “income mobility” now describes how the rich get richer while the poor ... actually get poorer.
The progress of the past 40 years has been mostly cultural, culminating in the broad legalization of same-sex marriage in the past couple of years.
However, by many other measures, especially economic, things have become worse, due to the establishment of neoliberal principles — anti-unionism, deregulation, market fundamentalism and intensified, unconscionable greed — that began with former US president Richard Nixon and picked up steam under another former US president, Ronald Reagan. Too many are suffering now because too few were fighting then.
What makes this an exciting time is that people are beginning to see links among issues that they have overlooked for far too long.
In 1970, after spending a year in New York absorbed by concerns seemingly as disparate as ending the Vietnam War, supporting the rights of Black Panthers to get fair trials (and avoid being murdered) and understanding the role of men in the women’s movement, I — and others — had conversations like this: “Let’s make people understand that all of those issues, plus poverty, racism, the environment and more, are all part of the same picture, and that fixing things means citizens have to regain power and work in their own interests.”
Of course we failed, as others did before and since. However, these same things can be said now, and they are being said by people of all colors.
When underpaid workers begin their strikes by saying “I can’t breathe,” or by holding their hands over their heads and chanting “Hands up, don’t shoot,” they are recognizing that their struggle is the same as that of African-Americans demanding dignity, respect and safety on their own streets.
Of course it is the same struggle.
“It’s the same people,” said Saru Jayaraman, director of the Food Labor Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley. “Young people working in fast food are the same people as those who are the victims of police brutality. So the Wal-Mart folks are talking about #blacklivesmatter and the #blacklivesmatter folks are talking about taking on capital.”
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s (NAACP) Reverend William Barber II, a leader of the Moral Mondays movement in North Carolina, captures the national yearning this reflects.
“I believe that deep within our being as a nation, there is a longing for a moral movement that plows deep into our souls,” he wrote in an e-mail. “We are flowing together because we recognize that the intersectionality of all of these movements is our opportunity to fundamentally redirect America.”
“All of these movements?” Yes: The demands of the fast-food workers movement — US$15 per hour minimum wage and a union — have helped to unite movements among airport workers, hospital workers, retail workers and more.
There are already results. Two years ago, there was talk of raising the minimum wage to US$10; now US$15 per hour is seen as the bare minimum.
Seattle and San Francisco have already mandated this, Chicago’s City Council voted to gradually increase to a US$13 minimum by 2019, Oakland is scheduled to move to US$12.25 in March and a proposal is being considered in Los Angeles.
In addition, although the amounts were woefully inadequate, four red states voted to approve minimum wage increases last month, showing that the concept resonates across party lines.
Meanwhile, the credibility of those who argue that employers “can’t afford” to raise pay — McDonald’s paid its chief executive US$9.5 million last year — is nil. For one thing, there are examples of profitable businesses that treat their employees decently, and even nations where fast-food workers can make ends meet. For another, underpaying workers simply shifts the cost of supporting them onto public coffers.
As US Senator Bernie Sanders said: “In essence, taxpayers are subsidizing the wealthiest family in America.”
That would be the Waltons. (Incredibly, many Republicans still want the working poor to pay more taxes.)
Then, of course, there are the matters of justice and morality. It simply is not right to pay people a sub-living wage with no potential for more, and as comedian Chris Rock said, employers would pay even less if they could get away with it.
The #blacklivesmatter movement — there is no better description — is already having an impact as well. Do not think for a second that people would be having a national debate about police brutality — one that includes many on the right — or a White House plan to examine and fix law enforcement, without demonstrations in the streets.
US President Barack Obama’s initial plan is encouraging, but lacking, and that is all the more reason to keep demonstrating. (What good are body cameras, by the way? The videotape of Rodney King’s beating was seen around the world yet resulted in acquittals; Eric Garner’s choking death, viewed millions of times online, did not even lead to a trial, even though police chokeholds are banned in New York City.)
Besides, as Sanders said: “Even if every cop were a constitutional lawyer and a great person, if you have 30 percent unemployment among African-American young people, you still have a huge problem.”
I have spent a great deal of time talking about the food movement and its potential, because to truly change the food system, you really have to change just about everything: Good nutrition stems from access to good food; access to good food is not going to happen without economic justice; that is not going to happen without taxing the super-rich; and so on.
The same is true of other issues: You cannot fix climate change or the environment without stopping the unlimited exploitation of natural and human resources — see Naomi Klein’s This Changes Everything. Same with social wellbeing.
Everything affects everything. It is all tied together and the starting place hardly matters: A just and righteous system would have a positive impact on everything we care about, just as an unjust, exploitative system makes everything worse.
Increasingly, it seems, there is an appetite and even unity to take on the billionaire class. Let us recognize that if people are seeing positive change now, it is in part because elected officials respond to pressure, and let us remember that that pressure must be maintained no matter who is in office. Even if Sanders were to become president, the need for pressure would continue.
“True citizenship,” Jayaraman said — echoing former US president Thomas Jefferson — “is people continually protesting.”
Precisely.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and