Tue, Dec 16, 2014 - Page 9 News List

Sending troops to protect Persian Gulf dictators threatens all

CIA torture, crushing democracy and Britain’s new military base all deliver the toxic message that ‘enduring interests’ are more important than human life

By Seumas Milne  /  The Guardian

People might have known the outline of the global US kidnapping and torture program for a few years. However, even the heavily censored summary of the US Senate torture report turns the stomach in its litany of criminal barbarity unleashed by the CIA on real and imagined US enemies.

The earlier accounts of US brutality in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo pale next to the still-sanitized record of forced rectal “infusions” and prolapses, multiple “waterboarding” drownings and convulsions, the shackled freezing to death of a man seized in a mistaken identity case, hooded beatings and hanging by the wrists, mock executions and sleep deprivation for up to 180 hours.

What has been published is in fact only a small part of a much bigger picture, including an estimated 100 or more prisoners tortured to death in US detention . Added to the rampant lying, cover-ups and impunity, it is a story that the champions of US “exceptionalism” will find hard to sell around the world. It is hardly out of line with a CIA record of coups, death squads, torture schools and covert war stretching back decades, some revealed by an earlier Senate report in the 1970s.

Of course, there is nothing exceptional about states that preach human rights and democracy, but practice the opposite when it suits them. For all the Senate’s helpful redactions, Britain has been up to its neck in the CIA’s savagery, colluding in kidnapping and torture from Bagram to Guantanamo, while dishing out abuses of its own in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So one would hardly think this reminder of the horrors unleashed in the name of the war on terror was the time for Britain to announce its first permanent military base in the Middle East in four decades. The presence of Western troops and support for dictatorial Arab regimes were, after all, the original reasons given by al-Qaeda for its jihad against the West.

The subsequent invasions, occupations and bombing campaigns led by the US, Britain and others have been endlessly cited by those who resisted them in the Arab and Muslim world, or launched terror attacks in the West. However British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond proudly declared on Dec. 6 that Britain would reverse its withdrawal from “east of Suez” of the late 1960s and open a navy base “for the long term” in the Persian Gulf autocracy of Bahrain.

The official talk is about protecting Britain’s “enduring interests” and the stability of the region. However, to those fighting for the right to run their own nation, the message could not be clearer. Britain, the former colonial power, and the US, whose 5th Fleet is already based in Bahrain, stand behind the island’s unelected rulers. No wonder there have already been protests against the base.

Bahrainis campaigning for democracy and civil rights, in a state where the majority are Shiite and the rulers Sunni, were part of the Arab uprisings in 2011. With US and British support, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) crushed the protests by force. Mass arrests, repression and torture followed.

Three years later, Bahrain’s human rights situation has gotten worse, and even the US government has voiced concerns. However, British ministers purr about the “progress” of the monarchy’s “reforms,” praising phoney elections to a toothless parliament, boycotted by the main opposition parties. Bahraini activist Zainab al-Khawaja was sentenced on Dec. 4 to three years in jail for tearing up the king’s photograph. Her father, Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, is already serving a life sentence for encouraging peaceful protest.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top