Despite the controversies and criticism, it is undeniable that independent Taipei mayor-elect Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) idea of allowing the public to endorse and vote for his Department of Labor director is an innovative experiment worth some recognition in the history of the nation’s democracy.
As part of his promise to have an open and transparent government with public participation, Ko announced during his campaign that if he won, instead of unilaterally appointing city officials, he would invite the public to recommend or endorse candidates for most department leadership roles and would organize committees to review qualifications and interview the candidates.
Even more adventurously, Ko added that the public would vote to choose the heads of certain departments from finalists selected by the committees.
While astonished by the innovative system, the public was quick to discover shortcomings and defects in its design: The makeup of committee members and the standards that they would use to pick finalists came under immediate fire, with many questioning the fairness and transparency of the proposal.
The public also expressed concerns about Ko’s office not verifying the identities of people who registered to vote online and having no way to prevent fraud in online voting.
Regardless of the controversies, Ko insisted on advancing his “experiment in direct democracy,” while also compromising by limiting the i-voting system only to the selection of the labor department director.
In the end, i-voting proceeded smoothly on Sunday, resulting in the election of labor rights advocacy group Raging Citizens Act Now secretary-general Lai Hsiang-ling (賴香伶) to head the labor department.
Ko told reporters that he had plowed head with the i-voting system, despite feeling frustrated on occasion by the criticism, because he believes that voters supported him in the mayoral race due to his promises to bring about new ideas and change. He would be no different from conventional politicians if he became reluctant about i-voting due to criticism, Ko said.
The i-voting system and the selection committees are new ideas and it was inevitable that there would be problems. However, if the nation always clings to conventional ways of handling public issues — thinking: “This might not be perfect, but it is good enough” — society and the nation’s young democracy will never progress.
There have always been pioneers in democracy who were brave enough to be trailblazers and there have always been others who might not necessarily oppose new ideas, but who remain skeptical.
During the Martial Law era, many Taiwanese thought that ending the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) authoritarian regime was impossible, but thanks to those dreamers who risked their lives the era ended in 1987. Later, some Taiwanese feared that the direct election of the president would only bring about chaos and did not think that the government would allow it. However, less than a decade after the end of martial law, the nation held its first direct presidential election.
The selection of city and municipal officials through popular votes or committees is a similar story.
Sure there were problems, but if the system were never put into practice, the nation would never know whether it could work, and problems would go unnoticed without a chance to examine the system and improve it.
The system might not be completely transparent, but it is better than having the mayor or the elite few around him handpick officials.
Compared with the lives lost and people jailed for decades in the battle for democracy, the price Taiwan and Taipei pay for Ko’s “experiment in direct democracy” is minimal and definitely worth trying.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.