The results of the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections did not only change the traditional blue-green division of Taiwan’s fundamental political landscape, it also shook up the power distribution within the central government: Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) stepped down as premier as soon as the electoral results became clear and three days later, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) resigned as chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Many people think the semi-presidential system is the main factor in a constitutional crisis, because it gives the president strong powers without accompanying accountability and turns the premier into a presidential chief-of-staff who may be sacrificed at any time to help the president avert a crisis. Some people feel that this system is unworkable and are suggesting that the Cabinet system be changed.
The question is, will replacing the semi-presidential system with a Cabinet system solve the constitutional crisis? This question can be approached from two perspectives: one theoretical and the other practical.
Theoretically, a Cabinet system is even more of a winner-takes-all system than a presidential or semi-presidential system. Under a Cabinet system, the prime minister or premier controls both the executive and the legislative arms of government, unless the Cabinet is one made up of several parties, in which case the parties in the coalition government share the executive and legislative powers.
In semi-presidential and presidential systems, if the same party holds both the presidency and the parliamentary majority, then the system will, just like in a Cabinet system, be one in which the winner takes all.
However, if the president and the parliamentary members of his or her party fare differently in elections, lawmakers will sometimes distance themselves from the president and vote against bills that they support. This makes it clear that the winner-takes-all component is weaker in a semi-presidential or a presidential system than in a Cabinet system.
Switching to a Cabinet system will not solve the problem of excessive amounts of power being concentrated in the hands of the president under a semi-presidential system. Overall, the premier or prime minister in a Cabinet system will be more powerful than a president. In addition, the Cabinet system also involves a transparency issue, as policies are often decided in closed-door Cabinet meetings, making it impossible to oversee the legislative process.
Taiwan’s next presidential election in 2016 will be the fifth direct presidential election. Once direct presidential elections were introduced, it became difficult to turn the presidency into a figurehead position, because doing so would be contrary to the public’s will.
For example, after indirect presidential elections in the Czech Republic — a European democracy — were transformed to direct ones, the position’s real power increased and the Czech president now frequently interferes with administrative operations.
In Taiwan’s semi-presidential system, the president appoints the premier, but does not need the approval of the legislature to do so. Just like in Russia’s mixed presidential-parliamentary system — a subvariety of the semi-presidential system — the result in Taiwan has been operational problems, making it easier for the president to expand his power and enhancing the likelihood that democracy will collapse.
To reform the nation’s system of government, reformers should be looking at a premier-presidential system as a model, as this is another, more stable, subtype of the semi-presidential system.
In the premier-presidential system, the president appoints the premier and the legislature has the right to approve that selection. At the same time, Article 75 of the Constitution, which stipulates: “No member of the Legislative Yuan shall concurrently hold a government post,” would have to be changed. The premier and the Cabinet members should come from the legislature. This is the system used in many stable European countries that have a semi-presidential system, such as Portugal and Finland.
Ma stepping down as KMT chairman following the elections only changed the way he exercises power, since for all practical purposes he remains the most powerful person in the KMT.
Ma’s successor as party chair and the new premier will still need to report important personnel appointments or policy decisions to Ma, or ask for his instructions. It is of no great significance if he doubles as party chairman. Unless he steps down as president or leaves the party, it is more or less impossible to separate Ma’s fortunes from those of the KMT.
The Nov. 29 defeat has placed restraints on how Ma, whose approval ratings as president are very low, exercises his power. It has introduced a balance of power and power-sharing into the nation’s democratic transition, which will serve to strengthen the resilience of democratic operations.
Finally, a Cabinet system is not a cure-all, nor is it necessarily appropriate for the Taiwanese view of the presidency as the main seat of power. What the nation needs is the more stable type of operation that a subvariety of the semi-presidential system would bring, not the abandonment of the semi-presidential system altogether over fear of minor problems.
Tsai Jung-hsiang is a political science professor at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and