The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) believes itself to be invulnerable, but it has been brought down by corruption and incompetence. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was like a rabbit caught in the headlights after the party’s rout in the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections, though he seems more preoccupied with what his forebears would think than what the results meant for the Taiwanese public.
Suddenly, KMT legislators, who are more accustomed to being voting machines, all have their own ideas about what went wrong: Some are calling for unity; others are starting to want to go it alone.
Those that blame the defeat on the lack of party unity are concentrating their attention on rallying around Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and advising against Ma pursuing a lawsuit against him. However, Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), whose political fortunes are so tied up with Ma, cannot, dare not, let Wang off without a nod from Ma.
The unity faction believes that Ma is chiefly responsible for the decimation of party unity. While abandoning the lawsuit against Wang may enable Ma to avoid another court defeat, it would not eradicate corruption and incompetence within his administration, or solve the structural and power contradictions between Ma’s faction — which rests on the party-state doctrine — and the mainstream popular faction.
The KMT is pathologically opposed to the idea of independence. It stands to reason that a nation needs to be independent, but the Leninist structure of the party over which Ma presides does not countenance independent integrity, independent decisionmaking, or independent behavior.
The KMT only knows how to keep a grip over the party, government, the military, the judiciary, the legislature and the intelligence agencies. What the chairman says, goes.
Ma controls the judiciary and prosecutors. He abused his powers and saw to it that former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was locked up. Filled with revenge and retribution, he would not even grant a medical parole to an increasingly ill Chen.
Ma also abused his powers over the wire-tapping saga, embarking on an attempted purge of Wang. Well, throwing Chen behind bars has served its purpose, and will no longer help the KMT’s election prospects.
As far as Wang is concerned, many Taiwanese empathize with him as an outsider, a local boy made good: He is regarded as the figurehead of the pro-localization faction within the party. Ma’s attack on Wang merely served to paint the former as the person responsible for the split within the party.
There are those within the KMT who are asking for Ma to resign both as party chairman and as president in the aftermath of the rout, as he is widely seen to be the main culprit behind the election defeat.
Ma, however, has chosen to remain as the puppet master, only making a gesture by standing down as party chairman.
To save their own skins, KMT legislators are seeking to distance themselves from Ma in droves, announcing that they will do things independently, that they are no longer willing to being mere “yes” men for the executive branch. If this does come to pass, it will be a major step forward for the nation’s democracy.
Taiwan’s democracy will only get stronger if the electorate can choose freely and consign the old party-state mentality to history, thereby promoting an independent legislature and an independent judiciary.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and