Hau comments are offensive
I find some of former premier Hau Pei-Tsun’s (郝柏村) remarks quite interesting (“Ethnic discrimination seen in KMT attacks, Nov. 21, page 3). I did not say: “good.” I said interesting. He says that the Taiwanese were “loyal subjects of the Japanese emperor.” Well, Hau, just what were the Taiwanese to do?
Their island, Ilha de Formosa, was given to Japan by China as a result of losing a war. Taiwan was a Japanese colony until 1945 and after 1945 it became what amounts to a colony of the Republic of China (ROC). After the war, the Taiwanese did not “invite” the ROC to move to Taiwan. The ROC forced itself upon them.
It does seem odd to me that retired Taiwanese military officers are permitted to move to the mainland, a sworn enemy, and continue to draw their pensions. I know that in the US, we would not be allowed to do the same in certain countries.
As for these officers actually “returning home,” maybe Taiwan should just simply cut its losses and allow them to go without any compensation. Those who possess certain classified information can and should be withheld from departure to an aggressor nation. Yes, this is still permitted in a democracy. This is guarding “state secrets” and should be covered by a state secrets act.
Of course, I understand why Hau would much prefer that people cease discussing, or even thinking about, the 228 Incident. How better to forget who was responsible for it?
This is a great diversion tactic and his light-handed approach to how many people were killed or “disappeared” I think is insulting. How many of his family members went out and never returned? Was his village bombed or pillaged by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) soldiers? Of course not.
Hau, like many others, tends to marginalize those Taiwanese who had to live through the first colonial period under the Japanese and then the “colonization” and abuse by the KMT.
However, I commend the students at Sun Yat-sen University for putting hard and pointed questions to him (“Ex-premier faces protests in Greater Kaohsiung, Dec. 9, page 3). This is about the real history of Taiwan and its people. Revisionist history just will not do.
Tom Kuleck
Greater Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with