The ‘status quo’ is rocking
On Nov. 29, Taiwanese sent a very clear message to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that they distrust Ma and rejected the KMT’s leadership via a landslide vote in the nine-in-one elections that resulted in the KMT losing 9 out of 16 county and metropolitan level executive positions, with the party’s popularity dropping from 55 percent to 40 percent.
On Wednesday last week, Ma responded to the disapproval by saying that KMT reforms had not occurred fast enough to meet public expectations, which explained the election results. He apologized to supporters for the disappointment and then stepped down as KMT chairman after Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and KMT Secretary-General Tseng Yung-Chun (曾永權) resigned.
Did Ma make this decision to focus on political reform? On one hand he resigned as chairman, but he then authorized the appointment of Wu Dun-yi (吳敦義) to succeed him and the appointment of Mao Chih-kuo (毛治國) to replace Jiang as premier.
The new chairman should be elected by the central committee, not appointed by an ousted chairman. Mao is Ma’s “yes-man.” Ma’s appointments not only disappointed the pan-blue camp, but also upset the pan-green camp.
Where does Ma’s loyalty really lie? Does he support the Republic of China (ROC)? If so, why did he not care how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) envoy greeted him as “you” instead of “president?” It seems he cares only about a summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). What a shame. Obviously Ma believes that Taiwan is part of the ROC and the ROC is part of China.
Independent Taipei mayor-elect Ko Wen-je said Taiwan is his main concern in cross-strait relations with China, labeling the latter a foreign nation. Ko’s campaign director Yao Liming (姚立明) agreed that Ko’s stance on Taiwan’s independence was very straightforward.
DPP Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) on Tuesday last week at Capitol Hill in Washington said the nine-in-one elections in Taiwan were not a referendum on Ma’s cross-strait policy, and should not be regarded as a failure for China. So, it sounds like the DPP agrees with and endorses Ma’s China policy.
So, what is Taiwan’s “status quo?”
US President Barack Obama said it is based upon the Three Joint Communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
To the US, the ROC is separate from Taiwan, which means Taiwan is not the ROC and the ROC is not Taiwan. Unfortunately, the KMT believes Taiwan is part of the ROC and the ROC is China. The DPP believes Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan.
Following the elections, Taiwanese have realized that they have a voice in deciding their future and that of the nation.
Over the past 400 years, Taiwanese have been treated as second-class citizens or slaves of a foreign government.
Now the “status quo is rocking.”
Are people waiting to be enslaved again and annexed by the PRC? Or are they willing to share their responsibility and be their own boss?
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations