It is amazing how fast the global strategic balance is changing. What it means is that since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the ascension of the US as the only global superpower in the 90s, the world is transiting into a state of multipolarity.
While the US still remains the most powerful military machine in the world, its position is strongly challenged by Russia and China.
Take, for instance, the Ukrainian situation. While the US and its Western allies have sought to pressure Russia through a regime of economic sanctions, they have so far avoided any military action to confront it. Indeed, Russian President Vladimir Putin at one point cautioned the NATO alliance not to mess with Russia, which has nuclear weapons.
In the case of China, even as it was flexing its political and military muscle in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, the US was avoiding any military confrontation. The contrast was quite marked to the mid-1990s when the US sent its naval flotilla to the Taiwan Strait, when China was seeking to thwart Taiwanese presidential elections by a show of military force.
However, while China is now asserting its power and making sovereign claims on islands in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, the US is mostly confining its role to criticizing Beijing’s unilateral actions. The situation has eased a little since China withdrew its oil rig from the vicinity of the Hanoi-claimed South China Sea islands, as well as going easy on its air identification zone over and around the contested — with Taiwan and Japan — group of islands in the East China Sea. However, the tensions can resurface at any time as China is determined to assert its “sovereignty.”
An interesting development in this changing strategic calculus is Japan’s active defense policy. Under its US-designed post-World War II constitution, Japan is a pacifist nation not allowed to wage war. It has a substantial self-defense force, but it is not meant for operations outside the country. Its defense is basically underwritten by its security alliance with the US. However, lately, since Shinzo Abe became Japan’s prime minister in 2012, Japan has been reacting to China’s assertion of power in the region with a certain creative reinterpretation of its pacifist constitution to enable it to be an active security partner with its allies and friends.
Even though it was the US that imposed the pacifist constitution on Japan after its defeat in World War II, it would now welcome Japan playing a defense role to supplement the US’ overstretched military commitments in the region and around the world.
As long as the US was both the dominant Pacific and world power, the regional countries at odds with China over territorial and maritime disputes were quietly confident that the US would underwrite their security, not just for their sake, but also to maintain its own naval supremacy.
Things have changed since then, as China is becoming more powerful and more assertive. And such assertive power projection has happened much more under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who took over the presidency early last year — not long after Abe became Japanese prime minister in late 2012.
In other words, the region is becoming unstable with both China and Japan determined to tough it out. Indeed, this almost led to aerial and naval incidents over the contested Diaoyutais (釣魚台列嶼) in the East China Sea.
While the US seems keen not to let the regional situation get out of hand between China and its regional allies and partners, the tensions in the region have the potential of developing into something ugly at any time.
China sees the US behind all the regional challenges to its power, which historically it regards as its own. By that logic, the US is an outside power with no business to be flaunting its reach.
However, the US is equally determined to remain engaged as an Asia-Pacific power with its own strategic, economic and political interests, as well as by virtue of its security and other commitments to regional countries.
Indeed, during his recent visit to Australia to attend the G20 meeting in Brisbane, US President Barack Obama reiterated the US “pivot” to Asia-Pacific, with the deployment of a substantial part of its navy to the region. In other words, the US is not letting China strategically appropriate the Asia-Pacific region to its own sphere.
That might be so.
However, China seems determined to alter the existing regional order designed by the US-led Western alliance. For instance, China has floated a parallel regional economic architecture of an Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) purportedly to help regional countries develop their economic potential.
Under US pressure, Australia and South Korea opted to stay out of it, obviously regarding it as rivaling the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. In the same way, China is actively pursuing an Asia-Pacific free-trade area to rival the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership from which China is excluded.
In other words, we are witnessing greater competition and rivalry between China on one side, and the US and its Asian allies, like Japan and Australia, on the other. And that portends trouble for the region.
It is not just the Asia-Pacific region that is a center of strategic rivalry. Elsewhere in Europe, Russia and US-led NATO are involved in a serious confrontation with Russia, with Ukraine as its epicenter.
Russia was supposed to see sense from US-led economic sanctions, as they are hurting its economy and the pain is likely to increase. At the recent G20 summit in Brisbane, Putin was warned that further sanctions awaited Russia if he didn’t back off from Ukraine.
However, so far it would seem that it is having the opposite effect. Moscow is expanding its military reach far and wide.
As Russian Minister of Defense Sergey Shoigu has reportedly said: “We have to maintain military presence in the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific, as well as the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico.”
Indeed, lately, Russia and China are drawing closer.
Moscow and Beijing recently signed a multibillion-dollar gas deal, and their navies are reportedly carrying out naval exercises in the Pacific and indeed in the Mediterranean next year.
Moscow is also strengthening its relations with Iran in the area of nuclear energy by undertaking to build two nuclear reactors, with six more likely to follow.
These power plants will operate under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. However, the timing of Moscow’s announcement — coinciding with the Nov. 24 deadline for a nuclear deal between Iran and its dialogue partners in the matter — was not appreciated by the US.
US Secretary of State John Kerry has likened the new global power balance to the 18th and 19th century.
To quote Kerry: “In many ways, the world we’re living in today is much more like 19th century and 18th century global diplomacy, the balance of power and different interests, than it is the bifurcated, bipolar world we lived in the Cold War and much of the 20th century.”
In whichever way one looks at it, it points to greater instability.
Sushil Seth is a commentator in Australia.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this