The transmission of messages from the future is a popular theme of science fiction movies.
Here are some ideas about what a possible future for Taiwan would look like.
The first concerns what would happen if, when polling stations have closed on Saturday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has lost both Taipei and Greater Taichung.
This eventuality would result in more than 13 million Taiwanese living in areas governed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or independent candidates.
If the KMT also loses Changhua County, the population under the sway of the pan-blue camp would drop below 9 million.
The two main political camps would once again enter a highly competitive period and it would be very difficult to predict the winner of the 2016 presidential election.
Each of the major parties — and perhaps even the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — would have to stand up to strict public scrutiny, in terms of their moral characters and integrity and their cross-strait, industrial, social and other policies.
In this parallel universe, the next two years would offer a great opportunity for promoting social advancement.
In the book Bomb Generation (崩世代), my collaborators and I suggest that the nation is set to face a serious economic and social crisis as the country is taken over by big business, slides into national debt, poverty among young people rises, birth rates drop and the population grows older.
The Sunflower movement also stressed the nation’s excessive reliance on cross-strait trade, and the consequences of a closed and rigid representative democracy.
It is also important to bear in mind how the food scandal involving Ting Hsin International Group’s (頂新國際集團) use of adulterated oil highlighted the negative effects of the exchange of power and money between the rich and privileged on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is in dire need of political and social reform.
Reforms necessary include the imposition of higher taxes on the wealthy; suppressing housing prices as a way to address the the wealth divide; lowering the voting age; legislative reform that could address the number of legislators; support for Taiwan-centered renewal; encouragement of young entrepreneurs; the establishment of a long-term care system that could include reform of the retirement pension system and an expansion of public kindergartens.
Each of these measures would allow the nation to move one step closer to a more open and equal society, encourage innovation among the younger generation and facilitate sustainable economic and environmental development.
Increasing competition between political parties and politicians would force local governments to renew policies and encourage public participation, and the central government — and perhaps even foreign forces — would also have to respond actively to public opinion.
In an alternative future, the KMT wins Taipei, Greater Taichung and Changhua County and is unassailable.
If this were to happen, weaker groups that wanted to challenge a world ruled by the rich and privileged would have to resort to the same methods now used by laid-off factory workers and farmers who have lost their land — lying down on railroad tracks, blocking roads, going on hunger strike or committing suicide to get the attention of the government and the media.
Which future do we want?
Lin Thung-hong is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs