Two tragic and haunting images have emerged this year: Hooded Islamic State executioners holding their knives to the necks of innocent victims, and masked medical workers bravely fighting an uphill battle against an Ebola outbreak for which the world was not prepared. However, the year’s lasting legacy is likely to be an even more extensive disaster, with recovery taking years, if not decades: Nearly 2 million newly displaced children, trapped in conflict zones across Iraq, Syria, Gaza, the Central African Republic and elsewhere.
These children have joined the ranks of 25 million displaced boys and girls worldwide — a number equivalent to the population of a midsized European nation and the largest in the 70 years since the end of World War II.
Images of vulnerable, desolate refugee children — likely to be displaced for a decade or more — have become so common that the world seems unable to comprehend what it is seeing.
Illustration: Mountain People
However, the plight of child refugees is only one reason why a new approach to children’s rights is needed.
This year, an estimated 15 million school-age girls are set to become child brides, forced into marriage against their will. About 14 million boys and girls below the age of 14 are child laborers, many forced to work in the most hazardous of conditions. In addition, 32 million girls are denied the basic right to attend school, owing to gender discrimination; about 500,000 are trafficked each year.
In the 1950s, the fight against colonialism dominated world politics. In the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, great civil rights battles were waged against racial discrimination and apartheid, followed by struggles to advance the rights of disabled people and sexual minorities. It is this generation’s task to tackle the unfinished business of prior civil rights movements, by ending the exploitation of children — especially girls — and ensuring compulsory universal education.
To mark the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), I, along with one of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize winners, Kailash Satyarthi, and UK Overseas Development Institute executive director Kevin Watkins, am calling on the world community to offer practical support to the burgeoning civil rights struggle of young people.
We can do more to end child labor, child marriage, child trafficking and discrimination against girls, by not only demanding the proper policing of domestic laws, but also by establishing a new International Children’s Court, buttressed by a credible reporting and sanctions system.
Violations of children’s rights are now so rampant that there simply is no alternative. Indeed, though no human rights treaty has been more widely ratified than the CRC, which requires governments to report on their compliance once every five years, its work lacks adequate resources and enforcement. Only one in seven nations submit compliance reports on time and one-third do not submit even a year late. Meanwhile, the poorly funded offices that manage the information have a two-year backlog.
Another promising initiative — the “optional protocol on communications,” aimed at enabling children and their advocates, for the first time, to bring cases before the UN Human Rights Committee — has been similarly weakened by a lack of strong support, authority and resources. Just 14 nations have ratified the protocol since it was agreed upon in 2011.
Moreover, nations are not legally bound to change the policies or laws that are deemed to violate their international human rights obligations. In addition, a shortage of investigative resources has led to an emphasis on problematic legislation, instead of the larger issue of inadequate enforcement of laws that promote the CRC’s principles.
So there is a case not only for an International Children’s Court, but also for children and their representatives to be granted the right to petition it. Such a court must have the capacity to receive and investigate individual complaints, the power to independently monitor the enforcement of laws and the resources to devote to investigations into relevant areas, including child labor, child marriage, child slavery, genital mutilation and child rape.
Over time, a reporting system could be implemented to facilitate an examination of the impact of health and educational policies on the world’s most marginalized boys and girls. Such research could provide compelling evidence to support compulsory universal education as the ideal mechanism not just for ending educational exclusion, but also for bringing an end to child labor and trafficking, early marriage and discrimination against girls.
Another advance could follow, based on former South African and Mozambican first lady Graca Machel’s victory a decade ago in persuading the UN Security Council to implement a system for reporting violence against children in conflict zones. At the time, it was agreed that a Special Representative on Children and Armed Conflict, whose work is backed by the threat of sanctions, would also be established. Today, a similar post — underpinned by the same system of reporting and sanctions — should be created to focus on children’s other rights.
Next month, Satyarthi and international girls’ rights leader Malala Yousufzai are set to share this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, reminding the world that a children’s rights struggle is under way — one that is increasingly being led by young people. Frustrated with adults’ failure to discharge what should be their duties toward children, young people are forming child-marriage-free zones, launching antislavery groups and organizing education-rights campaigns.
Such initiatives — including Bangladesh’s 20 child-marriage-free zones, Nepal’s Kamlari Forum and Ethiopia’s Yellow Movement of university students — might not yet be trending on Twitter and Facebook, but they are engaging millions of young people worldwide.
Now, the Global March Against Child Labor, Girls Not Brides, and A World at School have come together to support the #UpForSchool petition, which links the universal provision of education to ending child exploitation.
Over the next several months, youth groups in 190 nations plan to collect, it is hoped, a record number of signatures.
However, people must do more than read and sign the petition. They must recognize that today’s movement to ensure children’s rights is the civil rights struggle of our generation — and do whatever it takes to support it.
Gordon Brown, a former British prime minister and chancellor of the exchequer, serves as the UN special envoy for global education.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with